<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In High-Profile Prosecutions, Martha Coakley Made Her Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background</link>
	<description>WBUR is Boston&#039;s NPR News Station, featuring NPR news and programs such as Car Talk, On Point, Here &#38; Now, Only A Game and Radio Boston.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-4818</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-4818</guid>
		<description>AG Coakley, has shown by her deeds and actions, to lack the integrity that is necessary to hold the office of AG, never mind the office of Senator of this CommonWealth. If you just review the &#039;accomplishments&#039; listed in this article with more than a superficial eye, you notice a trend.  She exploits the cases that she is involved with for politicaly gain.   In the end it isn&#039;t about justice, it is about &quot;just us&quot; her and her agenda that is served by her actions.   If she had any integrity she would have brought to light the true nature and events in the Fells Acre case.   Not it would not have been politiclly expedient to do so, but it would have been the &#039;right thing&#039; to do.   The fact that she did the opposite, with such zeal, tells me all that I need to know about her! 

She will not be getting my vote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AG Coakley, has shown by her deeds and actions, to lack the integrity that is necessary to hold the office of AG, never mind the office of Senator of this CommonWealth. If you just review the &#8216;accomplishments&#8217; listed in this article with more than a superficial eye, you notice a trend.  She exploits the cases that she is involved with for politicaly gain.   In the end it isn&#8217;t about justice, it is about &#8220;just us&#8221; her and her agenda that is served by her actions.   If she had any integrity she would have brought to light the true nature and events in the Fells Acre case.   Not it would not have been politiclly expedient to do so, but it would have been the &#8216;right thing&#8217; to do.   The fact that she did the opposite, with such zeal, tells me all that I need to know about her! </p>
<p>She will not be getting my vote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonra salt</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>sonra salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>Martha Coakley has honed her skills in the tough world of prosecution. We are hoping to fill a seat whose legacy is &#039;equality&#039;; voting rights; civil rights; access to health care for all; support for immigrants.  The state of Massachusetts has a strong history of representing these rights in our Senate. As AG and as a prosecutor this is not the experience or I believe the interest of Martha Coakley.  She seems dangerously attracted by the &#039;Homeland Security&#039; protection from the vague threats of a &#039;war on terror&#039; which much of the Obama adminstration has dropped as useful terms.  I admire her stance on the Stupak amendment, but I do not believe that someone who will dig into to build coalitions to solve problems, but that she would continue her use of &#039;law and order&#039; which has had such a heavy hand in this country that we have one of the largest incarcerated populations in the world.  We need government to build coalitions social programs to solve problems before they cost us money and tragedy.  I don&#039;t believe that Martha Coakley will be ready to build important social change through strenghtening social protection and funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha Coakley has honed her skills in the tough world of prosecution. We are hoping to fill a seat whose legacy is &#8216;equality&#8217;; voting rights; civil rights; access to health care for all; support for immigrants.  The state of Massachusetts has a strong history of representing these rights in our Senate. As AG and as a prosecutor this is not the experience or I believe the interest of Martha Coakley.  She seems dangerously attracted by the &#8216;Homeland Security&#8217; protection from the vague threats of a &#8216;war on terror&#8217; which much of the Obama adminstration has dropped as useful terms.  I admire her stance on the Stupak amendment, but I do not believe that someone who will dig into to build coalitions to solve problems, but that she would continue her use of &#8216;law and order&#8217; which has had such a heavy hand in this country that we have one of the largest incarcerated populations in the world.  We need government to build coalitions social programs to solve problems before they cost us money and tragedy.  I don&#8217;t believe that Martha Coakley will be ready to build important social change through strenghtening social protection and funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polterrer</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>Polterrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>http://eiortyk.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eiortyk.com" rel="nofollow">http://eiortyk.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etyjetuykk</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>etyjetuykk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>http://rportlostonet.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rportlostonet.com/" rel="nofollow">http://rportlostonet.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lizoptixtom</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-2892</link>
		<dc:creator>Lizoptixtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-2892</guid>
		<description>http://jgrtyjp.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jgrtyjp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://jgrtyjp.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Martha Coakley did not make her name prosecuting political corruption. Every political corruption case during her time as AG has been prosecuted by the US Attorney&#039;s office not the Mass AG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha Coakley did not make her name prosecuting political corruption. Every political corruption case during her time as AG has been prosecuted by the US Attorney&#8217;s office not the Mass AG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.L. Dryfoos</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>G.L. Dryfoos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>When Ms Coakley can give the Amiraults back all the years she took away from them, only then would I consider her for higher office.  The only public position she deserves is bent over, in the public stocks, on the Boston Common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ms Coakley can give the Amiraults back all the years she took away from them, only then would I consider her for higher office.  The only public position she deserves is bent over, in the public stocks, on the Boston Common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SISTER MAUREEN PAUL TURLISH</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>SISTER MAUREEN PAUL TURLISH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>END STATUTES OF LIMITATION FOR CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS

The Rev. Paul R. Shanley is an archetypal figure, a product of the clerical system that spawned, enabled and protected him.

He speaks to the tragic need to change all states’ inadequate childhood sexual abuse statutes for the protection of children.

To even consider that Shanley remained a priest for 43 years after the first credible and official complaint was made to the Archdiocese of Boston in 1961 is appalling.

Moreover, that he will remain a priest forever, even though he was officially laicized by the Holy See in 2004, because the church teaches that there is some indelible priestly character taken on by the soul during ordination is even more distressing.

It is insulting to the priests I know, especially those I have met across the country who attempt to minister to two and even three parish communities in rural areas of Colorado, Iowa, Louisiana and Minnesota. 

However, the more important reality is not that Shanley may retain forever some indelible priestly mark. Rather, it is that the possibility exists that he may obtain a new trial.

If life were fair, Shanley would spend the rest of his natural life incarcerated. Children, young people and vulnerable adults would never again be put in harm’s way as they were since Shanley’s 1960 ordination in the Archdiocese of Boston.

If life were fair and church officials like Cardinals Medeiros, Cushing and Law and Bishops Daily, Mulcahy and John McCormack, who knew about Shanley early on, had done what they should have done, there would be no entertaining the possibility of a new trail.

This reality is much harder to stomach and it is the reason why the citizens of all of our states should be supporting legislation that will forever remove all criminal and civil statutes of limitation regarding the sexual abuse of children.

It is unconscionable and downright immoral for churches of any denomination to be opposing the removal of statutes of limitation and fighting allegations of crimes, known to be credible, in court on the basis of arbitrary statutes.

This is tragic and it speaks to the skewed value we as a society place on children, especially those victims of childhood sexual abuse.

Church history tells us that the problems of sexual abuse were seriously condemned in the earliest days of the church. Church Councils and Canon Law were very specific in their condemnations of sexual aberrations and just as specific as to punishments, sometimes even including death.

As members of a community of believers, the people of God, we say we are concerned with the rights of the unborn. We say we are concerned with protecting the rights of immigrants, legal or illegal. We say we are concerned with the trafficking of human beings.

But while we may take the moral high ground on these issues, many of us ignore the victims of childhood sexual abuse who are right in front of us and instead talk about the abuse victims who must be in it for the money along with their greedy lawyers, make inflammatory statements about the anti-catholic attitudes of anyone who would suggest accountability and the bias of just about every newspaper in the country, calling down God’s eternal wrath on them from time to time.

None of which does much to address the problem.

This is a continuing societal problem, a tragedy of unspeakable horrors which must be dealt with, but justice, like charity, has to begin at home.

We are all still waiting for that promised accountability and transparency even while then United States Conference of Catholic Bishops president Bishop Wilton Gregory was telling us that, “The terrible history recorded here today is history.”

No, it is not behind us as Gregory would have wished because church records, forced into the public venue by courts across the country and around the world, have brought that reality home to us with a vengeance.

Jesus said, “the truth shall set you free,” but when will the truth be known?

Pope John Paul II did not do what needed to be done and Pope Benedict has come and gone yet the tragedy continues and so does the heartache.

Real accountability requires that all arbitrary statutes of limitation, criminal and civil, on the sexual abuse of our children be removed and that a window of at least two years be provided to allow previously time barred cases to be brought forward in a court of law.

Justice and charity are what Jesus taught. He never said it was contingent on the price tag. The people of all states and religious persuasions deserve better and our churches should be leading the way, not building barriers that thwart access to justice.

And Paul R. Shanley?

He should be kept in jail.

Sister Maureen Paul Turlish is a educator and member of the Delaware nonpartisan coalition Child Victims Voice. She testified before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees in support of Delaware&#039;s 2007 Child Victims Law whic removed all statutes of limitation in regard to childhood sexual abuse and provided a two year civil window for bringing forward previously time barred cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>END STATUTES OF LIMITATION FOR CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS</p>
<p>The Rev. Paul R. Shanley is an archetypal figure, a product of the clerical system that spawned, enabled and protected him.</p>
<p>He speaks to the tragic need to change all states’ inadequate childhood sexual abuse statutes for the protection of children.</p>
<p>To even consider that Shanley remained a priest for 43 years after the first credible and official complaint was made to the Archdiocese of Boston in 1961 is appalling.</p>
<p>Moreover, that he will remain a priest forever, even though he was officially laicized by the Holy See in 2004, because the church teaches that there is some indelible priestly character taken on by the soul during ordination is even more distressing.</p>
<p>It is insulting to the priests I know, especially those I have met across the country who attempt to minister to two and even three parish communities in rural areas of Colorado, Iowa, Louisiana and Minnesota. </p>
<p>However, the more important reality is not that Shanley may retain forever some indelible priestly mark. Rather, it is that the possibility exists that he may obtain a new trial.</p>
<p>If life were fair, Shanley would spend the rest of his natural life incarcerated. Children, young people and vulnerable adults would never again be put in harm’s way as they were since Shanley’s 1960 ordination in the Archdiocese of Boston.</p>
<p>If life were fair and church officials like Cardinals Medeiros, Cushing and Law and Bishops Daily, Mulcahy and John McCormack, who knew about Shanley early on, had done what they should have done, there would be no entertaining the possibility of a new trail.</p>
<p>This reality is much harder to stomach and it is the reason why the citizens of all of our states should be supporting legislation that will forever remove all criminal and civil statutes of limitation regarding the sexual abuse of children.</p>
<p>It is unconscionable and downright immoral for churches of any denomination to be opposing the removal of statutes of limitation and fighting allegations of crimes, known to be credible, in court on the basis of arbitrary statutes.</p>
<p>This is tragic and it speaks to the skewed value we as a society place on children, especially those victims of childhood sexual abuse.</p>
<p>Church history tells us that the problems of sexual abuse were seriously condemned in the earliest days of the church. Church Councils and Canon Law were very specific in their condemnations of sexual aberrations and just as specific as to punishments, sometimes even including death.</p>
<p>As members of a community of believers, the people of God, we say we are concerned with the rights of the unborn. We say we are concerned with protecting the rights of immigrants, legal or illegal. We say we are concerned with the trafficking of human beings.</p>
<p>But while we may take the moral high ground on these issues, many of us ignore the victims of childhood sexual abuse who are right in front of us and instead talk about the abuse victims who must be in it for the money along with their greedy lawyers, make inflammatory statements about the anti-catholic attitudes of anyone who would suggest accountability and the bias of just about every newspaper in the country, calling down God’s eternal wrath on them from time to time.</p>
<p>None of which does much to address the problem.</p>
<p>This is a continuing societal problem, a tragedy of unspeakable horrors which must be dealt with, but justice, like charity, has to begin at home.</p>
<p>We are all still waiting for that promised accountability and transparency even while then United States Conference of Catholic Bishops president Bishop Wilton Gregory was telling us that, “The terrible history recorded here today is history.”</p>
<p>No, it is not behind us as Gregory would have wished because church records, forced into the public venue by courts across the country and around the world, have brought that reality home to us with a vengeance.</p>
<p>Jesus said, “the truth shall set you free,” but when will the truth be known?</p>
<p>Pope John Paul II did not do what needed to be done and Pope Benedict has come and gone yet the tragedy continues and so does the heartache.</p>
<p>Real accountability requires that all arbitrary statutes of limitation, criminal and civil, on the sexual abuse of our children be removed and that a window of at least two years be provided to allow previously time barred cases to be brought forward in a court of law.</p>
<p>Justice and charity are what Jesus taught. He never said it was contingent on the price tag. The people of all states and religious persuasions deserve better and our churches should be leading the way, not building barriers that thwart access to justice.</p>
<p>And Paul R. Shanley?</p>
<p>He should be kept in jail.</p>
<p>Sister Maureen Paul Turlish is a educator and member of the Delaware nonpartisan coalition Child Victims Voice. She testified before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees in support of Delaware&#8217;s 2007 Child Victims Law whic removed all statutes of limitation in regard to childhood sexual abuse and provided a two year civil window for bringing forward previously time barred cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in its veins.&quot;- Ted Kennedy

Martha Coakley has given away public beach rights in Rexhame, MA to her cousin&#039;s own private neighborhood corporation.

Martha Coakley had accepted an unethical Honorary Doctorate Degree from Suffolk University while investigating the university.

Martha Coakley failed to protect a witness in a home invasion case during her time as a district attorney working with child abuse cases.

Martha Coakley failed to investigate rampant corruption in clergy sex abuse reporting violations at Marshfield Police.

Martha Coakley was afraid of Cartoon Network Light Brights and thought them a viable terrorism threat.

Martha Coakley, voted for Hillary Clinton even after delegates were released and told to vote for Obama because she felt more historically bound to vote for a woman who had no chance than for black man had the nomination of his party.

Martha Coakley is deceitful, not worthy of her current position, never mind running for senate.

She lacks the integrity to be Ted Kennedy&#039;s successor in the senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in its veins.&#8221;- Ted Kennedy</p>
<p>Martha Coakley has given away public beach rights in Rexhame, MA to her cousin&#8217;s own private neighborhood corporation.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley had accepted an unethical Honorary Doctorate Degree from Suffolk University while investigating the university.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley failed to protect a witness in a home invasion case during her time as a district attorney working with child abuse cases.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley failed to investigate rampant corruption in clergy sex abuse reporting violations at Marshfield Police.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley was afraid of Cartoon Network Light Brights and thought them a viable terrorism threat.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley, voted for Hillary Clinton even after delegates were released and told to vote for Obama because she felt more historically bound to vote for a woman who had no chance than for black man had the nomination of his party.</p>
<p>Martha Coakley is deceitful, not worthy of her current position, never mind running for senate.</p>
<p>She lacks the integrity to be Ted Kennedy&#8217;s successor in the senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glorybe1929</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>Glorybe1929</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>I think Ms Coakley could go to the International World Court in the Hague and sell her case of Sexual Slavery of children by Roman Catholic Clergy and their henchmen who cover it up on a daily basis around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ms Coakley could go to the International World Court in the Hague and sell her case of Sexual Slavery of children by Roman Catholic Clergy and their henchmen who cover it up on a daily basis around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya Willow</title>
		<link>http://www.wbur.org/2009/09/09/martha-coakley-background/comment-page-1#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Willow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wbur.org/?p=6232#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Not sure if an AG after a conviction for conviction&#039;s sake is someone I want in the senate. Certainly the Amirault family was destroyed by what many felt was a witch hunt but gave Ms. Coakley the kind of name that allows her to run for a US Senate seat. (&quot;Better hang wrong man than no man.&quot;)  Also, in a &quot;Patriot Act&quot; spy on citizens world, do I really want an AG passing legislation? Don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if an AG after a conviction for conviction&#8217;s sake is someone I want in the senate. Certainly the Amirault family was destroyed by what many felt was a witch hunt but gave Ms. Coakley the kind of name that allows her to run for a US Senate seat. (&#8220;Better hang wrong man than no man.&#8221;)  Also, in a &#8220;Patriot Act&#8221; spy on citizens world, do I really want an AG passing legislation? Don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

