Gov. Patrick Threatens To Boycott Hyatt
BOSTON — Gov. Deval Patrick is threatening to stop using Hyatt hotels for state employee travel, unless the chain reinstates nearly 100 housekeepers it laid off from its three Boston-area hotels.
Some of the housekeepers had worked for Hyatt for as long as 25 years and made up to $15 an hour. The hotel company discharged the housekeepers at the end of August and replaced them with workers from a Georgia-based staffing firm who get far fewer benefits and earn less – $8 an hour.

Gov. Deval Patrick listens Wednesday night to the stories of housekeepers laid off from work at Hyatt's three Boston-area locations. (Curt Nickisch/WBUR)
In a letter to the Hyatt CEO, Patrick accused the hotel chain of unceremoniously tossing out the workers to fend for themselves, and of paying barely livable wages to the new workers.
On Wednesday night, some of the discharged housekeepers met with Gov. Patrick. They told him that despite Hyatt’s denials, they had been forced to train their replacements.
Patrick said he understands that businesses have to make tough decisions in this economy, but that Hyatt’s move was unconscionable.
“If they must take this path, there’s a right way and a wrong way to do it,” Patrick said. “They’ve done it in an exceedingly wrong way. And it seems to me the only way to make it right is to offer these folks their jobs back.”
If not, Patrick said state employees will no longer stay in Hyatt Hotels when it comes to state employee travel. That’s a threat that has more symbolic than financial impact. Hyatt is still paying health benefits for the laid-off workers, but has said the challenging economy forced the staff changes.
The company said it regrets having to make the personnel change (PDF), but that the hotel industry is facing the worst economic climate in decades. Business and personal travel is way down. Maryann VaRence, the company’s human resources director in Boston, said the governor is playing politics, with a price.
“There are 600 associates who work in Hyatt properties in Massachusetts,” VaRence said. “The governor’s boycott would be a direct threat to those jobs.”
State business with the hotel chain is relatively small, in the tens of thousands of dollars a year. But the governor’s threat has turned what touched a public nerve into a symbolic standoff.
- Beacon Hill »
- State House Roundup: That’s Quicksand, That Ain’t Mud
- Evacuation Day Repeal In Legislative ‘Purgatory’
- Listen: After Brown, Republican ‘Gains To Be Made’ In Many Districts
- Commentary »
- Littlefield: Finally, Soccer Has Major-League Problems
- Is Curling A Sport? (Who Cares?)
- Many Winter Olympians Already Have The Gold
- Crime & Justice »
- What’s New In Gardner Case? Just The Year
- Ex-Harvard Student Indicted In Dorm Shooting Death
- Mass. Court Upholds State Gun-Lock Requirement
- Energy »
- Everett Settles In With Its Big, New Neighbor In The Harbor
- Salazar’s Cape Wind Decision Is Difficult, For A Consensus Builder
- Patrick Calls For Plymouth Nuclear Plant Investigation After Vermont Leak
- Environment »
- Fishermen Gather For Summit On Industry’s Fate
- Everett Settles In With Its Big, New Neighbor In The Harbor
- Scientists Say Potential For Red Tide Outbreak Is High
- Ethics »
- Review: Mass. House Spending On DiMasi Case ‘Fair’
- Galluccio Resigns From Senate After Being Jailed
- After Sentencing, Fate Of Galluccio’s Senate Seat Remains Unknown
- Religion »
- As Construction Alters Closed Church, Jamaica Plain Builds Its Community
- Listen: Talk Of Renewal, But Few Decisions In Pope’s Irish Clergy Summit
- Irish Catholics Call For Cardinal Law’s Resignation, Following Clergy Abuse Report
- Sprint To The Senate »
- How He Did It: Behind The Scott Brown Win
- Scott Brown, The New Hero Of The GOP
- Tea Party Credited With Giving Brown A Winning Boost
- H1N1 Swine Flu »
- FAQ: Swine Flu Vaccine Availability
- Mass. Lifts Swine Flu Vaccine Restrictions
- Study: Swine Flu Is Relatively Mild Virus After All
- In Season 3, ‘Breaking Bad’ Characters Get Badder
- Live Video: House Debates Health Care Bill
- Rep. Lynch To Vote Against Health Care Bill
- ‘Not Ted Kennedy Reform’: Rep. Lynch Defends Vote Against Health Care Bill
- Stomach Virus Is Surging In Boston
- A Mural Of Many Colors Is One High School’s Lingua Franca
- Why We Gain Weight As We Age
- Senate To Take Up Unemployment Insurance Extension
- Rep. Gutierrez On Why The Health Bill Has His Vote
- House Opts For Straight Vote On Health Bill
- A Mural Of Many Colors Is One High School’s Lingua Franca
- Live Video: House Debates Health Care Bill
- In Season 3, ‘Breaking Bad’ Characters Get Badder
- Why We Gain Weight As We Age
- Mom-And-Pop Site Busts The Web's Biggest Myths
- Abraham Lincoln Reborn As A Vampire Slayer
- Invasive Plants Spreading As Climate Warms, Study Says
- Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran?
- A Cop And Her Dog
- Big Top Cinema: Circus ‘Pit Band’ Scores Film
- Texas Textbook Tussle Could Have National Impact
- Rep. Gutierrez On Why The Health Bill Has His Vote
- Why We Gain Weight As We Age
- Bluff The Listener
- Prediction
- Who's Carl This Time?
- A Mural Of Many Colors Is One High School’s Lingua Franca
- Jail Hosts Exclusive SXSW Concert
- Lightning Fill In The Blank
- Thousands To Rally For Immigration Overhaul
-
Petrie-Flom Center Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics Workshop; Glenn Cohen
March 22, 2010
At Harvard Law School, Hauser Hall -
The Three Hour, Learn Everything, Breastfeeding Class
March 22, 2010
At Crunchy Granola Baby -
ENCOUNTERING SLAVERY AND RACE IN NEW ENGLAND lecture at Myrtle Baptist Church
March 22, 2010
At Myrtle Baptist Church -
Bruce Marshall Monday Night Open Mic
March 22, 2010
At Smoken' Joes's





[...] Gov. Patrick Threatens To Boycott Hyatt [...]
Claudia, my previous comment was intended in large part for you. We can argue back and forth about which would be worse for the economy: disabling the consumers’ spending power by making their wages unsustainably low, or preventing a business from laying off *any* employees at all. The answer is in the balance: macroscopically (ie looking at the US’s entire labor force) some layoffs – *not* firings – are necessary, but some retention of the workforce (incl. long-term, higher-paid employees) is also crucial. The key is in the balance. Considering that Hyatt fired 100 housekeepers across 3 hotels – a *very* significant portion of the housekeeping staff of hotels of that size – if the rest of the businesses across the country followed suit, we’d surely be hit with another depression. Layoffs need to be administered in careful, measured ways, so that they do not upset the balance of the economy.
Although it may seem to make *mathematical* sense to fire long-term (and full-time) workers and hire new, cheaper labor/contractors (possibly on a part-time basis), it doesn’t actually make much economical sense in the grander scheme of things. If you’re thinking about the numbers only short-sightedly, theoretically, it may seem like it would make sense. But what is to stop any employer – especially a large enough number of employers – in any industry from doing this? Doing so would do two things:
1) Since most people would be out of a full-time/benefits-eligible job, they would be forced to take anything they can get, including part-time, contract, and low-salary jobs. This would in turn create the sort of working conditions we saw at the beginning of the 20th century: no benefits and unsustainably low wages. The people and the government have worked for the past 100 years to change this. (And let’s not even get into what that would do to consumer spending – the #1 driver of economic activity in the US).
2) This would create what I call ‘the Wal-Mart Effect:’ fire your full-timers, fire your long-term employees, save some money, and put a financial strain/burden on the state/federal government by overusing welfare and public health programs. Now, that doesn’t sound very capitalistic or small-government, does it? (For a review of studies on the effect of Wal-Mart on public health programs across the country, see “The Wal-Mart Tax: A Review of Studies Examining Employers’ Health Care Cost-Shifting.” (AFL-CIO) http://www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/walmart/upload/walmart_tax_memo.pdf )
Claudi’s argument is BS and a red herring! The real issue is the attack on the American worker by Corporations. Outsourcing jobs to cheaper sub contractors is only one technique. The reason these subcontractors can pay 1/2 is because they typically don’t offer health insurance or other benefits. If Claudia is so concerned about the Corporate bottom line why doesn’t she also complain about obscene Executive pay. I’m guessing that she is also the first to complain about Govt spending when that same $8/hr worker goes to the Emergency room for treatment and can’t pay or when that same person gets unemployment or when that person’s kid needs extra help in overcrowded schools. Grow up Claudia.
What an idiot. The pot calling the kettle black. I’m a state worker, and they are doing that exact same thing where I work. They’re pushing out the union mechanics to replace them with contract mechanics. They did it already at one of our sites and are in the middle of doing it to 13 people at this site. I don’t see this in the news. I don’t think the government should be stepping into the affairs of businesses. They’ll just wreck what remains of the struggling businesses and leave more people unemployed.
Did they try to see if they would work for less pay or less hours. What they did was treat them as 2nd CLASS citizens. And, only a 2nd class hotel chain would do that!To compare laying off housekeepers to laying off teachers is a bit of a stretch. Apples and oranges would be a lot closer economically.
The problem is that Hyatt did not lay off the workers. Hyatt fired them and hired replacements at a lower cost. Lay off means that the workers are no longer needed. In this case, they were no longer wanted. I wonder what the CEO of Hyatt gets. Wouldn’t it be interesting to see the senior executives make a decision to take a small paycut in order to cut costs rather than fire low-end workers. The move by the governor simply says that the state, which does very little business with Hyatt, will do no business with Hyatt. The response that 600 people work at Hyatt is irrelevant. What about the 100 MA citizens who were fired?
Gov. Patrick’s move is anti-capitalistic, hypocritical and is going down a dangerous path. Laying off housekeepers is not any different than laying off teachers, which he claimed was necessary. And although it is regrettable that this too was necessary, we can not fault a business for trying to cut costs so that it can survive in this harsh climate. If we do go down this path, where do we stop? Can we blame a business for freezing salaries or finding cheaper vendors? If we do go there, we will be handcuffing businesses from taking mitigation measures in a recession and will inevitable lead to more bankruptcy, which is is no one’s best interest. Not even the housekeepers.