Listen LIVE button

WBURA Perfect Game, Made Imperfect

Published October 7, 2009
Yankees pitcher Don Larsen delivers a pitch in the fourth inning of Game 5 of the World Series, Oct. 8, 1956, en route to throwing a perfect game. (AP)

Yankees pitcher Don Larsen delivers a pitch in the fourth inning of Game 5 of the World Series, Oct. 8, 1956, en route to throwing a perfect game. (AP)

BOSTON — In a new book misleadingly titled “Perfect,” the author, Lew Paper, tells a baseball story I’d never heard. Paper says that years after Don Larsen of the Yankees beat the Dodgers in the only no-hit, no-walk game ever to occur during the World Series, Dodgers outfielder Duke Snider claimed that the man calling balls and strikes during that game, Babe Pinelli, had essentially acknowledged that he’d bagged the gem for Larsen.

It was the umpire’s final game before retirement, and Paper has Snider saying, “Babe Pinelli told me that he wanted to go out on a no-hitter in a World Series. That was the last game he was going to umpire. So anything close was a strike.”

The critical “anything” in this case was the final pitch of the game, the called third strike on Dale Mitchell, which all the Dodgers, then of Brooklyn, and most of the Yankees, then as now of New York, agreed was well outside the strike zone.

Maybe it wouldn’t have mattered. Maybe Mitchell would have swung at and missed the next pitch, or maybe he’d have popped it up, or maybe hit it far enough to require one of the Yankee outfielders to have made a spectacular catch.

Yankees catcher Yogi Berra is embraced by Don Larsen at the end of Game 5 of the World Series, Oct. 8, 1956. Larsen had pitched a perfect game against the Brooklyn Dodgers. (AP)

Yankees catcher Yogi Berra is embraced by Larsen at the end of the game. (AP)

But it does matter, doesn’t it?

I mean, if you are, say, 61, and you’ve thought since 1956, when you were eight, that Don Larsen’s achievement represented one of the very few flawless performances ever submitted by any athlete in any sport anywhere, how do you like learning that the called third strike that sealed the deal was, at best, dubious, and, at worst, a fraud?

Anybody who is 61 knows that a lot of pro athletes are clods, just as they know that no insurance company is really in business to be your good neighbor, and that there are any number of beers at least as drinkable and much more satisfying than the one that claims to be the king.

But why this story? Because, shouldn’t some illusions endure? The one that is inseparable from the image of Yankees catcher Yogi Berra charging out to the mound to throw himself into Don Larsen’s arms, for example? The one that had appended to it that most unlikely adjective: perfect?

The one that transpired when a particular eight-year-old was still innocent, incapable of even imagining a termite in the edifice of the umpire’s integrity?

WBUR Topics: Commentary   Sports  
Your Comments
Comments RSS
  • Please don’t let any such revelations darken my cherished memories of Sandy Koufax and his great triumphs with the Dodgers. He was my hero as as a pre-teen and beyond….

    Posted by Paul Horn on October 8, 2009, at 10:01 AM
  • Growing up in NY as 10 year old Brooklyn Dodger fan, I always recall this day as one of the bleakest, most humiliating days for my team, surpassed only by the Pedro melt-down in 2003. This is no way diminishes Don Larson’s accompishment, however, it’s another reminder of Yankee arrogance and domination – only back then in NY, the Yankee fan was the kid next door!

    Posted by Rich Frantz on October 7, 2009, at 3:27 PM
  • It figures. Remember Chuck Knoblauch’s phantom tags in the 1999 ALCS (which the umps confessed were bad calls after the fact)? Remember how Rodger Clemens was inexplicably not ejected from the game after throwing a bat at Mike Piazza? It makes one wonder how many championships this “storied franchise” would really have if they didn’t have the umpires help, not to mention all the PED’s.

    Posted by Liam on October 7, 2009, at 12:58 PM
  • Seriously? No. A child’s illusions must, in the fullness of time, be replaced with the hopefully truer sight of an adult. I don’t think my parents are infallible anymore (not that that feeling lasted very long), nor my teachers, nor that perfection is, in any way, achievable by mortal men or women. Perfection is an aspiration, not a goal. In its pursuit, we can, on occasion, become more than we once were, and having stretched that bit, we never quite relax into the shape we once had. But “perfect”, as a description of any human achievement, is one I reject. And when it is found that an achievement once so described is, in fact, imperfect, I want to know.

    Posted by tamoroso on October 7, 2009, at 9:31 AM
Have something to say?
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief. These comments are moderated by WBUR, but you are solely responsible for the content of your comments. By commenting, you agree to our Community Discussion Rules.

WBUR Topics
Most Popular
This site is best viewed with: Firefox 3.5 | Explorer 8 | Chrome 2 | Safari 4 | Weather provided by Yahoo!