Listen LIVE button

WBURGov. Patrick Announces $600 Million In Cuts

Published October 15, 2009  Updated October 16

BOSTON — Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick says the state is on track to be $600 million in the red this fiscal year. The governor is planning another round of spending cuts to balance the budget.

Patrick was legally required to assess this shortfall by Oct. 15. The $600 million figure is how much the state thought it was going to get in revenue this fiscal year that it now thinks it won’t get due to sagging sales tax and other revenues. Legally, he has until the end of the month to say exactly what cuts would cover that projected shortfall.

Massachusetts Budget

Gov. Deval Patrick faces reporters during a news conference in Boston on Thursday. (AP)

“There are no quick fixes,” Gov. Patrick said. “No easy choices. And no low-hanging fruit.”

Over the next two weeks, the governor wants his staff to make those hard choices more clear. Patrick is going to press unions to make concessions; he wants government executives to take furloughs; 2,000 state jobs may have to go.

Patrick said that, as much he doesn’t want to cut human services, he’s going to have to. “There are some things we do in state government that we’re not going to be able to do anymore,” he said.

Exactly what things will be named by the end of the month. One thing is clear: municipal funding is on the chopping block. The governor is asking state lawmakers to give him the authority to cut state aid to cities and towns.

Concord Democrat Cory Atkins said her fellow representatives recognize the emergency. “We’re in an operating room,” she said. “It has to be done.”

Her Republican colleagues praised Patrick for suggesting some of the measures they’ve been advocating for, including selling surplus state land. Even so, House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones Jr. said he is disappointed to see the governor’s lack of specific detail at this point.

“Given the real possibility that the $600 million figure will likely be higher,” Jones said, “one would have expected a more comprehensive and proactive plan for our fiscal solvency and economic recovery.”

Indeed, as big this shortfall is, it may well get worse.

Northeastern University economist Alan Clayton-Matthews was part of the expert team that helped the state government put a number to this expected revenue shortfall. Clayton-Matthews said that even this revised estimate may be have to be revised down again.

“If incomes and consumer spending continue to decline at the rates they have,” he said, “we could be entering a double-dip recession.”

A double-dip recession is an economic recovery that loses steam, leading back into recession. Should that happen, Clayton-Matthews warns, this current round of cuts wouldn’t be the last.

WBUR Topics: Boston   Deval Patrick   Economy  
Your Comments
Comments RSS
  • We because all those city workers they were not doing third job, and they get pay too much. I think Mr patrickhe did the right thing help me and you save some money.

    Posted by Jim on October 17, 2009, at 1:07 AM
  • I think everyone is missing the point. The governor is a dupe to the legislature. He gets to do the dirty work no one else will do. The governor gets the blame but the systemic problems are old and not of his making. It doesn’t seem to matter which party has the governorship, he is an outsider. Blaming him is like blaming Obama for the financial crisis.

    Posted by Anne on October 16, 2009, at 8:56 PM
  • Well well well. What a surprise that Patrick waits until the last possible second decreed by law to spring this on the Commonwealth. I like where Drew’s going with his post. The whole Hyatt debacle seems like just a little bump in the road from this vantage, doesn’t it? I called in a few weeks ago to comment on Patrick’s position on that situation, and I still believe I was right: any measure of responsibility to those who live in MA by our Governor is simply another constituency pandering PR move. What a phony, cheap-seeming politician. He certainly lives up to the stereotype of an opaque, sneaky, local politician.

    Posted by Stephen on October 16, 2009, at 4:10 PM
  • Give this guy a break. He is dealing with a tough economy and doing a great job handling fiscal nightmare.

    Posted by John Updike on October 16, 2009, at 3:52 PM
  • I wonder if Hyatt will refuse to let Gov. Patrick stay in their hotels in protest?

    Posted by Drew on October 16, 2009, at 2:26 PM
  • Maybe the pay raise the legislature got, after Patrick certified the well being of the state economy, should be discontinued. They should not be insulated from the financial pain that rest of the state feels and that they pass on to the cities and towns of the Commonwealth by cutting revenue sharing.

    Posted by Rudolf on October 16, 2009, at 9:16 AM
  • when I voted for Gov. Patrick, I was concerned about his employment in the corporate world. Unfortunately, my concern about the effect of his history has been realized. His brutal slashing of human services reflects an obvious insensitivity to the needs of the most vulnerable and a lack of allegiance to the working people of our state.

    Posted by Frederick Grant on October 15, 2009, at 9:46 PM
Have something to say?
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief. These comments are moderated by WBUR, but you are solely responsible for the content of your comments. By commenting, you agree to our Community Discussion Rules.

WBUR Topics
Most Popular
This site is best viewed with: Firefox 3.5 | Explorer 8 | Chrome 2 | Safari 4 | Weather provided by Yahoo!