Listen LIVE button

The Associated PressDejection Fills Maine Ballroom After Marriage Vote

Published November 4, 2009  UPDATED 12:31 PM

PORTLAND, Maine — Cecelia Burnett and Ann Swanson had already set their wedding date. When they joined about 1,000 other gay marriage supporters for an election night party in a Holiday Inn ballroom, they hoped to celebrate the vote that would make it possible.

Instead, they went home at midnight, dejected and near tears after a failed bid to make Maine the first state to approve same-sex marriage at the ballot box.

Friends console one another after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at an empty election night headquarters in Portland, Maine. (Pat Wellenbach/AP)

Friends console one another after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at an empty election night headquarters in Portland, Maine. (Pat Wellenbach/AP)

“I’m ready to start crying,” said Burnett, a 58-year-old massage therapist, walking out of the ballroom with Swanson at her side. “I don’t understand what the fear is, why people are so afraid of this change.

“It hurts. It hurts personally,” she said. “It’s a personal rejection of us and our relationship, and I don’t understand what the fear is.”

With 87 percent of precincts reporting, gay-marriage foes had 53 percent of the vote in a referendum that asked Maine voters whether they wanted to repeal a law allowing same-sex marriage that had passed the Legislature and was signed by Democratic Gov. John Baldacci.

“The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation,” said Frank Schubert, the chief organizer for Stand for Marriage Maine, which lobbied for the repeal.

For the gay rights movement, which has gained a foothold in New England, it was a stinging defeat. Gay marriage has now lost in every state – 31 in all – in which it has been put to a popular vote. Gay-rights activists had hoped to buck that trend in Maine, framing same-sex marriage as a matter of equality for all families in a campaign that used 8,000 volunteers to get out the message.

Five states have legalized gay marriage – Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Connecticut — but all did so through legislation or court rulings, not by popular vote.

Portland resident Sarah Holman said she was torn, but decided – despite her conservative upbringing – to vote in favor of letting gays marry.

“They love and they have the right to love. And we can’t tell somebody how to love,” said Holman, 26.

While the gay marriage opponents claimed victory, Jesse Connolly, campaign manager for No on 1/Protect Maine Equality, held off conceding until early Wednesday, when he issued a statement vowing to continue to press the issue.

The fight for marriage equality will continue, he told supporters at the Holiday Inn ballroom, where a buffet table included a three-tiered wedding cake – with two grooms standing side by side, two brides standing side by side and the inscription: “We all do!”

“We’re not short-timers. We’re here for the long haul and whether it’s just all night and into the morning, or it’s next week or next month or next year. We will be here. We’ll be here fighting. We’ll be working. We will regroup.”

For Burnett and Swanson, the July 10 wedding date – and a reception cruise on Casco Bay – is off.

Your Comments
  • Maine, the way life should be -> what happened here? I grew up in Maine, I know how we think, holding all so close to our hearts … but live and let live! That’s the way it should be, gender should not be the determining factor … we are all created equal, a difference of opinion/lifestyle should not be allowed to condemn one another. I thought there were laws against discrimination?

    Posted by Karen on November 4, 2009, at 11:15 AM
  • It wasn’t that long ago that a majority equally believed that there is no such thing as “Interracial Marriage,” that marriage was between a white man and a white woman OR a black man and a black woman. Should we call the joining of mixed couples something other than “marriage?”

    Posted by David Crane on November 4, 2009, at 10:38 AM
  • Another victory for the Taliban, horay fear. Next will be banning inter faith marriage, woot.

    Posted by revgms on November 4, 2009, at 10:34 AM
  • Until the biology of homosexuality is fully acknowledged, it will continue to be demonized by religionistas and others who are willfully ignorant. Being gay is not a ‘lifestyle choice’ any more than being left-handed is….or having blue eyes or brown hair. It’s the way you are from birth. You don’t get to choose your sexuality. So, why is this even an issue? Two people who want to commit themselves to one another in marriage, be they gay, straight, same or opposite handed, blonde, brown, red haired or bald…. CONGRATULATIONS and may you have a wonderful life together!

    Posted by Anna Galvin on November 4, 2009, at 10:18 AM
  • If this is about LOVE, then by all means go to a gay friendly state and get married. This is really about the legal benefits (i.e. insurance, social security etc). This is a good example of how out of touch our representatives are with their constituents.

    Posted by Lisa on November 4, 2009, at 9:33 AM
  • The word “marry” has been used generically for a long time. Electricians marry two wires together. A digital SLR can be said to marry the best qualities of old and new camera technology. So, the argument that “marriage means man and woman” has no basis in anything actually having to do with language. It’s just something uneducated people like to say. Sorry, Maine, that you’re so overrun with haters. My lobster rolls no longer taste the same.

    Posted by Adam Frist on November 4, 2009, at 9:28 AM
  • Maine voters don’t want to deny anyones “rights”. The point of the Maine voters is that there is no such a thing as “Gay-Marriage”. Marriage is between a man and a women. If you want to join same sex couples, call it something else. Newspeak doesn’t fly here.

    Posted by Rudolf on November 4, 2009, at 9:19 AM
WBUR Topics
Most Popular
Tweets About @WBUR Twitter
This site is best viewed with: Firefox 3.5 | Explorer 8 | Chrome 2 | Safari 4