An activist artist on the digital art frontier speaks out.
 |
 |
 |
Digital media print by Carmin Karasic |
Boston, MA - April 08, 2004 -
by Ken George
Carmin Karasic refuses to be pigeonholed. Sometimes, she is a performance
artist, as when she walked, dressed as a 19th
century Dutch maiden, through the streets of Eindhoven, a city in the
Netherlands. But much of her art is more serious, expressed in the swirling
and blending of pixilated color and image on a computer screen. Karasic, who
just turned 50, has had her works displayed in galleries in real space and
online, including the DeCordova
Museum in Lincoln, MA, and the Cyber
Art Gallery Eindhoven.
A self-described computer geek who worked in the
software industry -- including a stint at the upper tier of project management
at Lotus -- she was drawn to creating art with a computer after hearing an
NPR story on digital art, and is currently completing a master of arts at
the Massachusetts College of the Arts. In 2003, she was the director of the
Boston Cyberarts
Festival's virtual gallery, and is also a part-time instructor at the
Art Institute of Boston. An electronic activist as well, Karasic gained some
notoriety in 1998, for co-authoring a software
program that shut down Mexican government websites. The hack was in protest
of the Mexican government's policies in Chiapas.
Karasic sat down over a breakfast of coffee and fruit at her home in Quincy,
MA to talk about digital art and how art is -- and is not -- transformed by
new technologies.
wbur.org: Arts online contributor Peter Walsh notes
in his commentary "Digital
Logjam" that "virtually anyone with a computer, internet connection, and
a cheap color scanner," can acquire an art collection. Will art museums, in
the form of buildings, die out in the distant future?
Carmin Karasic: As much as I immerse myself continuously in the computer
world, there is still something that is wonderful about standing and looking
at a piece of art. Go to the Lutz Museum and stand there and look at the Dutch
Masters. I don't care how big your flat screen plasma monitor is -- it's not
the same! If you look at Jackson
Pollock in a two-dimensional presentation you cannot see how the little
globs of paint are raised on the canvas. As you're standing in front of one
of them and the light changes, it sort of comes alive with its own rhythm
- I don't know how to describe it. I can tell you I never loved his work until
I forced myself to go to that big retrospective in New York. And that's why
I think we have to have virtual
museums, because not everybody can go to New York and see the Jackson
Pollock retrospective. You have to have a way to at least get the idea of
the work out.
wbur.org: Is there something about the web that democratizes art?
CK: Absolutely. Online you are your own gatekeeper. Nobody has to decide
if your work is ready to be seen. Nobody decides if your art's good enough or
if it has value. Or that it behooves someone else to show your work. That's
what I love about the net.
wbur.org: Doesn't digital technology create an economic divide, between
people who can afford computers and those who can't?
CK: A lot has been written about how the web is free
information for everybody. But if you don't have the first level of communications
tools - basically a computer - you are cut off. Many people in the Third
World don't have access because their libraries don't have computers in
them. It is an elite world. That said, I do believe that someday it won't
be so elite. And of course there will always be people who don't get into
the web, but I do believe accessibility is going to become more and more generalized.
Multinational corporations want to get their products out into the world so
they are building an advertisement infrastructure, which is the net. I can
piggyback off their infrastructure to make my art, to distribute my art, to
distribute my ideas.
wbur.org: Some critics charge that digital technology lowers the artistic
bar.
CK: There is a ton of crap. And sometimes the crap is shown in the
galleries as art. A gallery thinks it is going to be really hip and 'with it'
by showing digital art, even though they don't understand it or really like
it. And on the web you don't need anybody to decide your art is ready to be
shown, so anybody can show anything. So yeah, there's tons of garbage. But if
you put your bad art out there, it's not going to get that many hits, it's not
going to show up that much on the search engines. The bad filters to the bottom
and what comes up in the search engines is mostly good.
wbur.org: Do you call yourself an "artist" or a "digital artist?"
CK:I
hardly call myself just an "artist." I felt I have to qualify
it because most people think of an artist in traditional terms and they don't
suspect I work with computers. Since everything I did involves computers in
some way, I called myself a "digital artist" for maybe five, six years. I eventually
found myself frustrated with that title and I switched it to "multimedia
artist."
The reason for the switch is because I do work that has the computer
at its base. Sometimes it's an installation. And if it's an installation,
there is a lot more than digital media that is involved -- I might be using
music, I might be using sculptures, I might be using projections; video. Calling
myself a "digital artist" is a little bit too limiting.
wbur.org: Are you primarily an artist, or geek, or a little bit of
both?
CK: Definitely 50/50. My computer was stolen once and I was completely
devastated. If somebody told me to make art but you can't use a computer, I
don't know where I would start.
I went to Burning Man in
'99 and didn't have electricity. One of the people said "come on, you are
an artist, make art" and I said, "I don't know how, I don't have a computer." There
was this big pile of dead motherboards somebody just dumped there. I took the
motherboards and fashioned a curtain to go around a stage. I was in an exhilarated,
almost Zen-like mood because I was working with computers and not with the
code. I was working with the physical of the computer.
wbur.org: Do artists who work in pastels, paints, and clay regard your
work with skepticism and hostility?
CK: I have certainly encountered some
hostility. But I have also met people who feel like I am part of the new wave,
the future. A painter once said to me, "this isn't art, these are computers!" It
just so happened I was setting up a project that involved Painter software.
He didn't even know how to use a mouse. I had to put my hand over his hand to
show him how to use it. And I said "you can do anything with this
software. It's true you don't have a paintbrush in your hand, it's true you
don't smell the paint, you don't have the reflex of the canvas, but look at
all these things you can do. You can adjust how hard you're painting, you can
adjust the substrate you're painting on, and you have millions of colors." After
awhile he got into it and something clicked. He went away realizing this can
be an art medium even though it's also a computer.
wbur.org: Do you prefer your work be exhibited in a virtual museum
or in its bricks and mortar counterpart?
CK: When people go into galleries
or museums -- unless it's a cyber museum -- they have an expectation. And I
don't believe I am doing work that can meet that expectation. They're thinking, "I've got 30 minutes to get through the floor of this museum," and
they're just looking, looking, looking, looking. A web art piece means you engage
with it and move around with it -- it's time based.
wbur.org: Is there any financial profit creating art that can be easily
downloaded from the web without paying a dime?
CK:I don't make any money from my art. You want it, take it.
To view
additional works by Carmin Karasic, visit
her electronic portfolio.

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |


|
 |


 |
Singer at 100 An exclusive online special explores the controversial work and life of Yiddish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer. |
 |
 |
 |
Gauguin's Tahiti Paintings Take a multimedia tour of Paul Gauguin's Tahiti paintings, including the famous painting, "Where Are We From." |
 |
 |
 |
Hawthorne at 200 View a multimedia celebration of Nathaniel Hawthorne's 200th birthday. |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|