
 |
 |
| Every search and purchase you make
from here supports WBUR |
|
|
 |
Years of bitter and expensive litigation as well as the challenging nature of her work have put the artistic legacy of dance giant Martha Graham in crisis. (see photos)
by Debra Cash
 |
 |
 |
Gary Galbraith and Virginie Mecene. Photo: John Deane |
Boston, MA - December 14, 2005 -
Imagine, for a moment, that the only people who could experience Vincent Van
Gogh's paintings were those who had lived during his lifetime. Future generations
would never directly experience the art as I did in my early 20s, when I could
have sworn I heard crows cawing over empty, wind-struck fields in the galleries
of the Van Gogh museum in Amsterdam.
Far fetched? Not really. Right now that
hypothetical scenario threatens the works
of choreographer Martha Graham. Unlike
paintings, dance work cannot be set aside and brought back into view decades later
unaltered and unharmed. To be preserved, dances have to be maintained, taught
and performed. Graham's oevre is not the only one at risk.
Martha
Graham was
97 when she died in 1991, after a long creative and physical decline. She left
a
large repertoire (with many of the best of her works still in active repertory)
and a rigorous training technique that has been disseminated across the globe.
She also
left a legal disaster that sent her school and company and the companion to
whom she had left her assets into years of bitter and expensive litigation.
Barred from presenting the
works during the years of courtroom
wrangling, company members dispersed, originators of important roles passed
away, and most audiences came to know Graham only as a name. Films of jewels
from the repertory, never in wide distribution, were only approximations of
what transpired on stage and could be off-putting in their mannerisms. It didn't
help that Graham had held onto roles she had created for herself as a younger
dancer long past the time when she could do them justice.
As Americans for the
Arts, a policy advocacy organization, once explained in its
ad campaign, "There's not enough art in our schools. No wonder people
think Martha Graham is a snack cracker." One winced to see the Bank of
America Celebrity Series, which last brought the Graham Company to town in 1996,
resorting to publicizing the company's return this winter with marketing that
stressed Graham's influence on Merce Cunningham, Paul Taylor and Twyla Tharp.
She was a
profound influence on those artists, but if you were a devotee of Merce
or Twyla, Martha's choreography might not be your cup of tea.
The company and
its current director, Janet Eilber, who started dancing with the
Graham Company in 1972, are racing against time and debt. The school is up and running, there
is control over the licensing of the repertory and opportunities for company
alumni to get back in touch. The company has experimented with contextualizing
the artist and her work with video examples and commentary from her great collaborators,
composer Aaron Copland and sculptor/set designer Isamu Noguchi. There is still
reason to hope that Graham's work will be performed across the country as part
of the National Endowment for the Arts' commitment to introduce audiences to
America's dance masterworks.
The combination of Graham's death and the legal
mess she left behind have taken their toll. When the Graham Company appeared
in Boston early this month during its 80th anniversary season, masterpieces
were on the boards, but the results were uneven and discouraging.
Taiwanese
dancer Fang-Yi
Sheu embodied Graham's genius in everything she
performed. "Spectre-1914," the
opening solo of "Sketches from Chronicle" (1936) is a kind of rethinking
and extension of Graham's breakthrough "Lamentation," of 1930, where
a grieving woman encased in a stretchy fabric tube "indicates the tragedy
that obsesses the body, the ability to stretch inside your own skin, to witness
and test the perimeters and boundaries of grief, which is honorable and universal."
In the later work, the grief is mixed with anger and has a very
explicit antiwar target. Sheu is a wrathful presence, her arms drumming as fabric
trails over the bench that she stands on, making her loom larger than life.
This is American expressionism at its best: the fabric of Sheu's
skirt extends
the pulse into space so that she rises like a flame taking on oxygen. She was
heart-stopping in the canted diagonal poses of the woman in Red in the palate-cleansing "Diversion
of Angels" of 1948, too.
Last summer I caught Sheu dancing the great Graham
role in the 1947 "Errand into the Maze" at Jacob's Pillow and there she used the
contraction and release technique of her torso as a language that punched out
a visceral Morse Code of fear, resolve and victory. Elizabeth Auclair is not
a dancer of equal caliber: her "Errand" in Boston was correct but
dispassionate. When she shielded her face from Martin Lofsnes' pawing Minotaur,
she barely looked resistant to his advances, and her legs swing so loose and
easily that the sense of weight and effort that gives this choreography meaning
dissipated.
The same thing happened with "Appalachian Spring." Despite
lucid performances, this was Graham without gravity. Musical Miki
Orihara was
a childlike Bride and Katherine
Crockett a soothing Pioneering Woman, but when
Crockett reaches across the landscape, promising the young couple opportunity
as far as the eye can see, the line should be as spatially specific as the sticks
that indicate the roof of the couple's homestead. Noguchi described it as being
like Shaker furniture. "Appalachian Spring" looks a lot like Agnes
de Mille's "Oklahoma !" in its current incarnation and that's a big
mistake. Graham was no Hallmark Card illustrator. She was exploring self-doubt
in the face of promise and staking radical modernist claims on America's settler
myth.
Stretched resources and tumult within the troupe, including the
firing of Terese Capucilli & Christine Dakin as heads of the company
itself last May, are only part of the
reason this is happening. It takes a
certain type of dancer to choose a career
with a company specializing in a legacy repertory rather than work with a living
choreographer. This predicament hit the Jose Limon company decades ago, and
in the not so distant future will inevitably affect the companies of Merce Cunningham
(frail if still adventurous at 86) and Paul Taylor (a spry and generative 75).
George Balanchine's school helps maintain his legacy and ballets, but close
observers have wondered how long New York City Ballet can maintain its eminence
and whether the balance between NYCB and outside companies that license Balanchine
ballets for their repertories has shifted since his death in 1983.
Graham's mythologized
self-dramatization, gendered characterizations and stark, distilled forms do
not fit easily into contemporary sensibilities more attuned to athletic virtuosity,
colloquialism and quick splices of volleying movement. That doesn't make the
dances less worthwhile, but it creates a challenge for a company used to unpacking
its sets and just presenting the work to be appreciated and applauded.
America
has a
dance history worth celebrating and sharing with anyone who can be touched
by great art. What are we going to do with it?

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |


|
 |


 |
Singer at 100 An exclusive online special explores the controversial work and life of Yiddish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer. |
 |
 |
 |
Gauguin's Tahiti Paintings Take a multimedia tour of Paul Gauguin's Tahiti paintings, including the famous painting, "Where Are We From." |
 |
 |
 |
Hawthorne at 200 View a multimedia celebration of Nathaniel Hawthorne's 200th birthday. |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |