Evidence-Based Medicine: Hard For Some To Swallow
This week two panels of medical experts recommended fewer screening tests for breast and cervical cancer. And recently, men got similar advice about prostate cancer screening.
The recommendations come from something called evidence-based medicine, and are being met with resistance from some consumer groups and physicians.
Evidence-based medicine is a pretty simple concept. "The basic principle of evidence based medicine is that clinical decisions that are made between doctors and patients should be driven by data," says Peter Bach, now a physician at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and once an adviser to the head of the Medicare system.
"What it means is the careful application of information from well-designed studies to decide what medical practices work, and how well they work," says Alan Garber, head of the Center for Health Policy at Stanford University.
People Don't Always Listen To Data
Evidence-based medicine can be used to determine how often someone should be screened for cancer, and it can be used to determine what sort of treatment is best. But people don't always want to do what the data say to do.
As a family physician in North Carolina, Lori Heim sees that a lot. It comes up all the time with sinus infections, she says. She remembers one patient who demanded antibiotics for her viral sinusitis, even though multiple studies show that's the wrong thing to do.
"The previous doctors gave her antibiotics and she got better," Heim says. But that's probably because she would have gotten better anyway, even without the antibiotics.
Heim is president of the board of directors of the American Academy of Family Physicians, and she says her group will take a close look at the mammography recommendations announced by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force earlier this week. New information and new ways to analyze it mean that guidelines often change.
That can make patients nervous, Heim says. "They want medicine to be absolute, and perfect, and unfortunately it's not."
Decisions Based On Science
Insurers already use evidence-based medicine to some degree. The current health overhaul bills under consideration encourage it without any strict requirements. The Senate bill, for example, uses the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force as a baseline, but not as a limit, for some parts of Medicare. Both bills provide money for more research.
Economist Uwe Reinhardt of Princeton University says the U.S. ought to pay more attention to evidence-based medicine. "You cannot have a health system where every doctor, every patient is completely free to use their imagination and hunches to make clinical decisions," he says.
Researchers estimate that anywhere from one half to two-thirds of current medical practice is based on concepts that have not yet been proven. And there's a history of procedures turning out to be useless. Years ago, many doctors periodically X-rayed smokers' lungs, thinking that detecting lung cancer early and starting treatment right away would reduce the death toll. But research showed that periodic X-rays didn't reduce the mortality of lung cancer among smokers.
Resisting Change
So what if people insist on mammograms in younger, lower-risk women, or lung cancer screening for smokers, or other procedures of questionable value?
"Then I would say but please why don't you go ahead and buy it," says Reinhardt, and don't depend on your health insurance or the government to pay for it.
The pushback against the mammography and pap smear recommendations shows that getting people to accept change is difficult, says Alan Garber of Stanford University. "If you come out with a study that says that something that people thought worked well maybe doesn't, that message may not go down so well," he says.
Garber is not as discouraged as some of his colleagues about the public confusion and reluctance regarding the new recommendations. He says what's needed is public education, which suggests some long study sessions and talking with your doctor.
Related Links
ROBERT SIEGEL, host:
From NPR News, it's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Robert Siegel.
This week, two panels of medical experts recommended that women need fewer screening tests for breast and cervical cancer. Recently, men got similar advice about prostate cancer screening. These pronouncements were all based on medical evidence gathered through research.
As NPR's Joanne Silberner reports, it can be tricky applying that research, what's called evidence-based medicine, to real life.
JOANNE SILBERNER: The concept of evidence-based medicine is pretty simple, says Peter Bach; now a physician at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and once an advisor to the head of Medicare.
Dr. PETER BACH (Physician, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center): The basic principle of evidence-based medicine is that clinical decisions that are made between doctors and patients should be driven by data that is accumulated through studies of groups of patients.
SILBERNER: But people don't always want to do what the data say to do, whether it'd be about screening or treatment.
As a family practitioner in North Carolina, Lori Heim sees that a lot, especially with sinus infections. She remembers one patient who demanded antibiotics for her viral sinusitis, even though multiple studies show that's the wrong thing to do.
Dr. LORI HEIM (Family Practitioner; President, American Academy of Family Physicians): The previous doctors gave her antibiotics and she got better. Well, she probably got better because the virus is a self-limiting illness.
SILBERNER: It was hard for Heim to convince her patient that antibiotics weren't the right thing. But she's sympathetic.
Dr. HEIM: They want medicine and science to be absolute and to be perfect. Unfortunately, it's not.
SILBERNER: And because there's always new information and new ways to analyze it, treatment regiments and guidelines are likely to keep changing, she says.
Insurers already use evidence-based medicine to some degree. The current health overhaul bills encourage it without any strict requirements. Economist Uwe Reinhardt says the country needs more of it.
Professor UWE REINHARDT (Economics, Princeton University): You cannot have a health system where every doctor and every patient is completely free to use their imagination and hunches to make clinical decisions.
SILBERNER: Evidence-based researchers estimate that more than one half of current medical practice is based on concepts that have not yet been proven, and there's a history of procedures turning out to be useless. Years ago, many doctors periodically x-rayed smokers' lungs, thinking catching lung cancer early would help. Research showed it made no difference in the course of the cancer.
So people insist on mammograms in younger, lower-risk women, or lung cancer screening for smokers, or other procedures of questionable value?
Prof. REINHARDT: If you want all this health care, pay for it and stop grouching about costs.
SILBERNER: The mammogram recommendations and the prostate and Pap smear recommendations for that matter didn't even consider cost. They only considered the medical risks and benefits.
Getting people to accept guidelines that can change over time is going to take some work, says Alan Garber head of the Center for Health Policy at Stanford University.
Dr. ALAN GARBER (Policy Director, Center for Health Policy, Stanford University): It's not enough for the public to know the results of the studies. When studies conflict, they need to have a better understanding of how we reach the conclusions we did about whether a test or a treatment works.
SILBERNER: Which suggests some long study sessions and talking with your doctor.
Joanne Silberner, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright National Public Radio.
- Beacon Hill »
- Mayor Controversy Throws Lawrence Bailout Into Jeopardy
- DeLeo Bets On The Colts And Re-Election
- Casino Supporters, Opponents Make Their Case On Beacon Hill
- Commentary »
- Advocacy Is In The Eye Of The Beholder
- The Richest Girls Basketball Coach In The World
- McGwire’s Record Breaking Tarnished? Sounds Like A Broken Record
- Crime & Justice »
- Mass. Court: Sexual E-Messages To Minors Legal
- Shot Street Worker Gets His Day At City Hall
- Boston Archdiocese Releases More Information On Abusive Priests
- Energy »
- As Battle Nears End, Cape Wind Still Divides
- The Art Of Going Green In The Museum
- Salazar Meets With Mashpee Wampanoag Over Cape Wind Concerns
- Environment »
- As Battle Nears End, Cape Wind Still Divides
- Invasive Plants Spreading As Climate Warms, Study Says
- The Art Of Going Green In The Museum
- Ethics »
- Galluccio Resigns From Senate After Being Jailed
- After Sentencing, Fate Of Galluccio’s Senate Seat Remains Unknown
- DiMasi, Co-Defendants Plead Not Guilty To Corruption
- Religion »
- Brown, And His Church, Don’t Wear Religion On The Sleeve
- Boston Archdiocese Releases More Information On Abusive Priests
- Archdiocese: Abusive Priests With Ireland Ties Worked In Boston
- Sprint To The Senate »
- How He Did It: Behind The Scott Brown Win
- Scott Brown, The New Hero Of The GOP
- Tea Party Credited With Giving Brown A Winning Boost
- H1N1 Swine Flu »
- FAQ: Swine Flu Vaccine Availability
- Mass. Lifts Swine Flu Vaccine Restrictions
- Study: Swine Flu Is Relatively Mild Virus After All
- Tea Party Activists Unite In Nashville To Protest Obama Leadership
- Why Does Time Fly By As You Get Older?
- Cyclists Race Through A ‘Canyon Of Beer’
- Teen Suicide Sheds Light On New Era Of Bullying
- The ‘Car Talk’ Spin On Toyota Recalls
- Brown’s Staff Shapes Up As Coalition Of The Eager
- Teacher Suspended After Party Photos Posted Online
- We Know Better, But We Text While Driving Anyway
- 'How's That Hopey, Changey Stuff?' Palin Asks
- Brown, And His Church, Don’t Wear Religion On The Sleeve
- Cyclists Race Through A ‘Canyon Of Beer’
- Teen Suicide Sheds Light On New Era Of Bullying
- We Know Better, But We Text While Driving Anyway
- Mass. Requests Federal Credit To Cover Unemployment Benefits
- Why Does Time Fly By As You Get Older?
- The ‘Car Talk’ Spin On Toyota Recalls
- Math Professor Helps Uncover Art Fakes
- DeLeo Bets On The Colts And Re-Election
- Teacher Suspended After Party Photos Posted Online
- Where You Live, Not Just Lifestyle, May Contribute To Diabetes
- WBUR Changes Weekend Program Lineup (90)
- Share Your Voting Experiences Today (84)
- Edward Kennedy, The Senate's Last Lion, Is Dead At 77 (64)
- Dems Question Why Brown Is Gaining On Coakley (64)
- Seeking Your Ideas For WBUR iPhone App (46)
- Brown Hits Back After Negative Coakley Ad (46)
- Obama Accepts Nobel Peace Prize As 'Call To Action' (45)
- Hollywood East's Less-Than Red Carpet Arrival (45)
- 'Absolutely' Wrong To Call Coakley-Brown Race A Statistical Tie (43)
- Blogging The U.S. Senate Debate (39)
- Tea Party Activists Unite In Nashville To Protest Obama Leadership
- Why Does Time Fly By As You Get Older?
- 'How's That Hopey, Changey Stuff?' Palin Asks
- Brautigan's Surreal Story: 'Trout Fishing In America'
- As Battle Nears End, Cape Wind Still Divides
- Teen Suicide Sheds Light On New Era Of Bullying
- We Know Better, But We Text While Driving Anyway
- Haitian Orphans' Fate In Limbo Amid Post-Disaster Confusion
- Teacher Suspended After Party Photos Posted Online
- Cyclists Race Through A ‘Canyon Of Beer’
-
Learning from Performers presents: soprano RENÉE FLEMING
February 9, 2010
At John Knowles Paine Concert Hall -
February Evening Lecture-- Some Recent Shipwreck Investigations in Northern Massachusetts Bay
February 9, 2010
At Northeastern University's Marine Science Center -
Salem History Society: When the Tall Ships Sailed Away
February 9, 2010
At Cornerstone Books -
Boston University's Distinguished Creative Writing Faculty to Perform Annual Reading
February 9, 2010
At Boston University School of Management




