Radio Boston Radio Boston

What Do More Retractions In Scientific Publications Mean For Research?12:16

Play
(Image credit: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory/Flickr)closemore
(Image credit: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory/Flickr)

Retractions in scientific publications issued for research misconduct — that is instances of data manipulation or falsification — has become a hot topic in recent years.

It is especially relevant to Boston, which is home to some of the most prestigious research labs and scientific journals.

A review published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of over 2,000 articles in bio-medical and life science research found that two-thirds of retractions were because of research misconduct — with the bulk of retractions coming in the last decade.

Guests

Ivan Oransky, co-founder of Retraction Watch, a blog that monitors retractions in scientific journals.

Maria Zuber, vice president for research at MIT.

More

The New York Times: Science Journal Pulls 60 Papers In Peer-Review Fraud

  • "A scientific journal has retracted 60 papers linked to a researcher in Taiwan, accusing him of 'perverting the peer-review process' by creating fraudulent online accounts to judge the papers favorably and help get them published."

The Guardian: Retractions Are Coming Thick And Fast: It's Time For Publishers To Act

  • "Journal publishers must acknowledge the limitations of traditional peer review and embrace post-publication peer review."

+Join the Discussion
Please help keep our community civil. All comments must follow the WBUR Community rules.
Share

Support the news

Next Up

Where to now?

More Radio Boston or Explore Audio.