|
Free trade is the free exchange of goods and services across international
borders. Nations have traded with each other for centuries, but
frequently tariffs have reduced that level of trade. Tariffs are
taxes imposed on goods coming into a country. A country would use
tariffs to protect their home industries.
For example, if Canada was more efficient at producing grapefruit
than the U.S., they might be able to sell them for $5 a bushel while
U.S. producers would sell them for $7. U.S. consumers would logically
choose the Canadian grapefruit because they would be cheaper. But,
if the U.S. government were to impose a $3 per bushel tariff on
every bushel of Canadian grapefruit imported, the price of Canadian
grapefruit would rise to $8 per bushel, and U.S. grapefruit would
then be cheaper.
By imposing a tariff on imports, a country can the protect its
home industries. If a country chooses to use tariffs, though, other
countries will likely retaliate and impose tariffs on products from
that country. Since classical economic theory argues that there
is always benefits to both parties in a trade, escalating tariffs
and protectionist policies can be seen as inimical to the overall
economic well-being of the world.
For most Americans, the World Trade Organization came into the
national consciousness during the late 1999 protests of the WTO
meeting in Seattle. The WTO was actually established on January
1, 1995, as the only global international organization dealing with
the rules of trade between nations. The goal is to help producers
of goods and services, exporters, and importers conduct their business.
The WTO's main responsibility is to encourage and then enforce trade
agreements between nations. Many of these trade agreements involve
mutual promises to reduce tariffs. If a nation feels an agreement
has been violated, the WTO has a procedure for settling the dispute
(click
here to view settlement process)
Click
here to view the WTO's membership list
GATT, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, was the precursor
to the WTO. The rough economic times of the 1930's encouraged countries
to enact large tariffs to protect their home industries from foreign
competition. In an effort to give an early boost to trade liberalization
after the Second World War, tariff negotiations were opened among
the 23 founding GATT "contracting parties" in 1946. GATT
was not an organization with any enforcement powers as the WTO is.
It was a general agreement that spawned several multinational meetings,
or "rounds," where the GATT nations made agreements about
reducing tariffs. GATT was always considered a "provisional
agreement" -- not a permanent treaty. The last major GATT round,
the Uruguay Round, which ran off-and-on from 1986-1994, led to the
creation of the WTO.
The North American Free Trade Agreement was a treaty signed by
the United States, Canada, and Mexico designed to increase trade
among the three nations. It was signed in 1992, ratified by Congress
in November 1993 and put into effect January 1, 1994. NAFTA eliminated
some tariffs among the three nations immediately while others were
scheduled to fall to zero over a 15 year period. Some feared that
the freer flow of goods and services across borders would encourage
American companies to move south to Mexico, bringing with them American
jobs. In such a scenario, there could also be a significant environmental
impact, as pollution laws are less strict in Mexico.
The International Monetary Fund is an organization of 183 nations
established in 1946 to promote the growth of international trade.
The IMF facilitates the exchange of currencies among nations and
helps countries maintain the stability of their home currency. If
the stability of a country's currency is in jeopardy, perhaps because
it has fallen behind in its payments to other countries, the IMF
can step in and provide temporary funding to boost that country's
currency.
Click to learn more about the IMF
The anti-globalization movement views the World Trade Organization
as an undemocratic body. While all member nations vote on most proposals,
the United States and a few other wealthy nations are thought to
basically determine which proposals get voted on. Records and discussions
of trade disputes are not open to the public. The WTO can impose
fines or authorize sanctions against a nation thought to be in violation
of a trade agreement. But, if the U.S. is in a trade dispute with
a small nation, sanctions by the small nation on the U.S. would
be negligible. On the other hand, U.S. sanctions on that small nation
could be crippling. Protestors argue that all of that makes the
WTO inherently biased in favor of wealthy nations.
Anti-WTO forces also view the organization as being beholden to
large corporations, either directly, or through the influence of
the wealthy nations that some say are in the corporations' back
pockets. Therefore, the WTO pushes through regulations and agreements
that benefit large corporations at the detriment of smaller nations.
Those opposing the WTO also the argue that the WTO frequently strikes
down local labor and environmental laws, calling them illegal barriers
to trade. According to Lori Wallach and Michelle Sforza, co-authors
of Public Citizen/Global Trade Watch's "Whose Trade Organization?"
have made a study of the 167 contested trade issues brought to the
WTO as of last March. Their conclusion: In every case in which an
environmental, health, or food safety law was challenged at the
WTO, such laws have been declared illegal barriers to trade. WTO
rulings have forced South Korea to lower meat safety rules and the
US to weaken its Clean Air Act, to cite just two.
While some view global trade as a good thing, many of those opposed
to the WTO are concerned about how it is being implemented.
Some text courtesy of
Mother Jones' "Globalization Watch" study
|