Support the news

Celebrating Major Health Cost-Control Plan, Though Some Still Wary

This article is more than 7 years old.
Gov.  Deval Patrick is expected to sign the new health care cost-cutting bill soon.
Gov. Deval Patrick is expected to sign the new health care cost-cutting bill soon.

A sweeping health care cost-containment bill is heading to the desk of Governor Deval Patrick.

"This is more than a good bill, a really great bill," Patrick said. "This is a commonwealth that has shown the nation how to extend coverage to everybody... and we’re going to crack the code now on cost control."

The Governor and legislature are celebrating a bill that has broad support but is being received with more wariness and trepidation than recent major health care efforts, including the landmark coverage law. As we’ve heard again and again, tackling health care costs is going to be hard.

Trying to hold down health care costs is one of those third-rail issues that many politicians won’t touch. As he introduced the bill, House lead author Steve Walsh stressed that while it’s projected to saved $200 billion dollars over 15 years, that’s not the only goal.

"What should be important to us is our son or daughter, or our husband or wife, or our mother or father," Walsh said. "And making sure that the health care that they need, that they deserve, is available to you, your constituents and your families in time of need. And there's nothing that we have done in any way, shape or form here today that will inhibit that."

Walsh and other authors of this complex bill are getting credit for taking on the challenge.As the presiding officer thanked Walsh his colleagues and members of the public looking on burst into a rare standing ovation.

Walsh and House Majority Leader Ron Mariano say they realize it won’t be easy for hospitals and doctors to keep health care costs in line with the rest of the state’s economy.

"We are moving the Titanic, but we’re moving it," Mariano said.

Specifically, the legislature is expecting health care to grow around 3.6% next year, as compared to recent years of 6 to 8% increases, and the bill says the change is supposed to start in January.

"You can’t bring that down easily in one year, yet that’s what the bill calls for. We’re going to try," he added.

Lynn Nicholas, president of the Massachusetts Hospital Association, says the good news for hospitals is that there’s no hammer at the end of next year if that don’t make the goal. Instead they’ll be asked to produce a corrective action plan. Even though many hospitals won’t hit the state spending target right away, Nicholas says it’s a good idea.

"The idea of setting an aspirational goal is the catalyst that we need to pull this whole thing together," Nicholas said. "It's just like the mantra before was "cover all of our citizens." We've got a mantra now. We need everyone to work and do their part to achieve that."

OK, so what will it take? Some people will tell you that Massachusetts can reach the goal by getting rid of waste. That might mean not repeating an MRI because your doctor wants to do his own, or having to fix a procedure that didn’t go well the first time. But Richard Aghababian, President of the Massachusetts Medical Society, says patients are going to have to spend money more wisely too, and be ready for some changes.

"To get to a goal of Gross State Product, we're going to have to look at cutting back on some services, not just in decreasing the indications for doing certain procedures," Aghbabian said. "I think it may affect accessibility to physicians. It mean that some patients can't get in to a procedure because there's no one to staff the machine or to do the procedure, at least as quickly as they have been up to this time."

The trade-off may be big savings, the $200 billion that Walsh and some health economists say is possible. But there are concerns about the sweeping changes the bill encourages, such as continuing the move to put providers on a budget. Just one lawmaker was willing to voice his concerns during House debate yesterday.

Because of this bill, patients may not get the care they deserve.

Representative James Miceli suggested that most legislators didn’t know what was in the bill’s 308 sections. The document was available for only about 16 hours before members took a vote.

"I really believe deep down that we’re going to live to regret what we do here today," he said.

That ominous warning was largely ignored as the House passed the bill 132 to 20. It cleared the Senate unanimously after a single speech from the Senate’s lead author Richard Moore.

This bill will continue the leadership of Massachusetts in the forefront of health care reform across the nation.

Governor Patrick, who has said that health care cost control is a top priority, is expected to sign the bill soon.

"This is the next in several steps — and I don't think the last step, by the way — in a commitment that this broad coalition has had for a long time, going back to 2006, to really make health care affordable and high quality for every single resident of the commonwealth. I’m very proud of that," the governor said.

When the governor signs this bill, it will be the fourth major piece of health care legislation passed on Beacon Hill in eight years. The test will be to see if this time, the state is able to hold the reins on health care costs.

This program aired on August 1, 2012. The audio for this program is not available.

Rachel Zimmerman Twitter Health Reporter
Rachel Zimmerman previously reported on health and the intersection of health and business for Bostonomix.


+Join the discussion

Support the news