Supreme Court Blocks Class Action Lawsuit Against Walmart05:30
Download

Play
This article is more than 8 years old.
(AP)
(AP)

Here & Now Guest:

  • Emily Bazelon, legal affairs editor for Slate.com

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court sided with Walmart Monday, saying that a massive a sex discrimination lawsuit against the retailer cannot proceed as a class action.

The case dates back to 2001 and could have involved payments in the billions to female employees who claim that the company offered them lower pay and fewer opportunities for advancement compared to their male co-workers. Slate.com's Emily Bazelon said the ruling will change class action law and impact gender discrimination suits.


Update: Supreme Court Limits Sex Bias Case

By: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Monday blocked a massive sex discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart on behalf of women who work there.

The court ruled unanimously that the lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. cannot proceed as a class action, reversing a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. The lawsuit could have involved up to 1.6 million women, with Wal-Mart facing potentially billions of dollars in damages.

Now, the handful of women who brought the lawsuit may pursue their claims on their own, with much less money at stake and less pressure on Wal-Mart to settle.

The justices divided 5-4 on another aspect of the ruling that could make it much harder to mount similar class-action discrimination lawsuits against large employers.

Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion for the court's conservative majority said there needs to be common elements tying together "literally millions of employment decisions at once."

But Scalia said that in the lawsuit against the nation's largest private employer, "That is entirely absent here."
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the court's four liberal justices, said there was more than enough uniting the claims. "Wal-Mart's delegation of discretion over pay and promotions is a policy uniform throughout all stores," Ginsburg said.

Business interests lined up with Wal-Mart while civil rights, women's and consumer groups have sided with the women plaintiffs.

Both sides have painted the case as extremely consequential. The business community has said that a ruling for the women would lead to a flood of class-action lawsuits based on vague evidence. Supporters of the women feared that a decision in favor of Wal-Mart could remove a valuable weapon for fighting all sorts of discrimination.

This segment aired on June 20, 2011.

Support the news

+Join the discussion
TwitterfacebookEmail

Support the news