Advertisement
Supreme Court Takes Middle Ground On Restitution For Victims Of Child Porn
ResumeThe Supreme Court on Wednesday said a federal law limits how much money victims of child pornography can recover from people who viewed their images online, throwing out a nearly $3.4 million judgment in favor of a woman whose childhood rape has been widely seen on the Internet. Two dissenting justices called on Congress to change the law to benefit victims.
The justices said in a 5-4 ruling that courts can order people convicted of child pornography to pay restitution to their victims, but only to the extent that there is a strong tie between the victim's losses and the convicts' actions. In this case, Doyle Randall Paroline was held liable by a federal appeals court for the entire amount of the woman's losses, though his computer contained just two images of her, among more than 150 illicit photographs.
The case involved a woman known in court papers by the pseudonym "Amy." Her losses have been pegged at nearly $3.4 million, based on the ongoing Internet trade and viewing of images of her being raped by her uncle when she was 8 and 9 years old.
David Savage has been covering the case for the Los Angeles Times and joins Here & Now's Robin Young with details.
- Related: Amy's lawyer discusses the case (January 2014)
- Read the decision in Paroline v. Amy Unknown and U.S.
Guest
- David Savage, Supreme Court correspondent for the Los Angeles Times.
This segment aired on April 23, 2014.