It’s been a “bad to worse” patch for the Republican Party. First they face a Democratic president who 81 percent of Americans say they like. Then they face an America where only 21 percent say they’re Republicans.
The permanent GOP majority envisioned by Karl Rove has given way, in crisis, to a Washington wholly dominated by Democrats, and critics calling the GOP “The Party of No” (somewhere between “a doomsday cult and Scientology," writes New York Times columnist Frank Rich).
This hour, On Point: we’ll ask where is the big tent for the GOP now, and does the Republican base want to raise it again?
Republicans, what do you think? Even if you’re no fan of Specter, are you worried about the GOP’s dwindling ranks? Do you want a broader party or a purer one? What happened to the “permanent majority?” Tell us what you think — here on this page, on Twitter, and on Facebook.Guests:
Matthew Continetti, associate editor at The Weekly Standard.
Last week, after Arlen Specter announced his defection to the Democrats, The New York Times framed the internal GOP debate in terms of a purer vs. a broader party.
The Los Angeles Times pointed to Olympia Snowe and Rush Limbaugh as examples of two very different reactions to Specter's defection.
Over at The Wall Street Journal, conservative columnist Peggy Noonan wrote that the GOP would collapse if it didn't maintain a big-tent attitude, while Bill Kristol, in The Washington Post, called Specter's switch "good news for Republicans."
This program aired on May 4, 2009.