WBURChurch Squatters Keep Faith As Vigils Drag On

SCITUATE, Mass. — Five handmade quilts hang around the altar of St. Frances Cabrini church. Each one commemorates a year the former parishioners of this closed church have illegally occupied the building.

“They represent who we are,” says Maryellen Rogers. She and her husband Jon are two of the leaders of this vigil, as they call it. The couple organize more than 100 people in groups of two to stay in the church day and night. The changing of the guard happens every two hours.

They’ve been at this for more than 1,800 days, protesting the Boston Archdiocese’s decision to shut them down.

“I thought it would be done within the year,” Jon Rogers admits. He is as surprised as anyone that these vigils — in five different churches in Scituate, East Boston, Everett, Framingham and Wellesley — are still going on.

“I truly believe, and maybe to a naive point, that based upon right versus wrong this would be done,” Rogers says. “We would be granted what we wanted, which would be to reopen this church as a fully functioning parish, they would see the error of their ways and say, ‘Oh, boy, did we make a mistake.’”

But Cardinal Sean O’Malley, head of the Boston Archdiocese, has not admitted any mistake by closing St. Frances and more than 70 other churches to shore up the coffers of the church. Instead he is tolerating the occupations, by paying the churches’ heating, electricity and snow plowing. Last year it cost $600,000 for the upkeep.

Sister Marian Batho is the archdiocese’s liaison to the churches in vigils. She says it is important to keep the buildings in safe condition while the Vatican hears the appeals.

“We probably did not expect that it would be five years,” Batho says, “but Cardinal Sean made the commitment to do nothing, really, until the appeal process had been completed.”

People following the process closely await a ruling from the Vatican’s highest court, which could come as early as this spring. None of the churches expect the Vatican to rule in their favor.

Peter Borre, co-chairman of the Council of Parishes, supports these vigils. Borre says they are protesting U.S. bishops who closed down viable parishes. He and others are sending a message that these bishops should not be trusted by the Vatican.

“We want to send a signal to Rome — and we’ve been successful in this — that all is not well in Catholic America and we’re clogging their review systems,” Borre says. “And this has come to the attention of the Pope.”

Even if Borre and others don’t win their appeals, he says the parishioners will stand firm. That will put the church in a difficult position. “They’re going to have to operate through writs of eviction and police or sheriffs’ deputies in five different jurisdictions,” he says.

Many protesters say they are willing to be arrested if it comes to that.

“But we would appreciate the cardinal being by the door explaining to us why it came to this,” Maryellen Rogers of St. Frances says. “Why he would not meet with us? Why they would not sit down and work on a resolution?”

The cardinal has not met with the groups running the occupations since 2008. The vigilers say while Sister Batho, who is the liaison for the archdiocese, lends a kind ear, she is not a decision maker. She says Cardinal Sean is a man of peace who is unlikely to call in the police.

But the archdiocese spokesman, Terry Donilon adds, “we also reserve the right — in the event of the need because of a safety issue or some other extenuating circumstance — to have to end them.”

The end might come sooner rather than later if the archdiocese is thinking about cost.

Because the church building no longer qualifies for a religious exemption, the town of Scituate recently ordered the archdiocese to pay about $45,000 in property taxes.

Other towns with church squatters might do the same. That would make the vigils even more expensive to tolerate, but a costly public-relations problem to solve.

WBUR Topics · Boston
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • PJ

    The best way to beat the RC Church is to withhold money. O’Malley is being lauded in Rome for increasing revenues again.
    Hold back the money and the guys in lace will give serious thought to those who put food in their rather large bellies.

  • Arthur McCaffrey

    Cardinal O’Malley has abandoned his pastoral responsibility to all the catholics in his diocese including those in vigil. By refusing these parishes the sacraments for 5 years he has violated his vow of service and ministry to ALL his flock. These vigil parishes however are inspired by the Holy Spirit and remain flourishing and vibrant despite being abandoned by O’Malley. They are truly an American Catholic Church, one that is of the people, by the people, for the people. What a wonderful lesson in faith they teach us.

  • Paul Quincy

    Well, if God wants them to stay, and if they want to please God, shouldn’t they be turning out their own pockets to buy the property, manage it, staff it and justly use it, as their own, while paying taxes, like responsible and ethical citizens?

  • alexdarc

    This was yet another disgusting abuse of their parishioners. It is a testament to the faith of the people that they continue to hold out hope and stand up for their parish. A church is just a building, a parish is a community, it is a shame that the Archdiocese has decided
    that only “profitable” parishes deserve religious services.
    And of course it would have never even come to this if the Catholic Church let the Police deal with the sex offenders they harbored instead of bouncing them from one town to another.
    They are lucky anyone want to be Catholic at all anymore.

  • alexdarc

    “shouldn’t they be turning out their own pockets to buy the property, manage it, staff it and justly use it, as their own, while paying taxes, like responsible and ethical citizens?”
    That is part of the complaint, the people of each parish have poured countless dollars in to these churches over the years, building them, maintaining them, paying their taxes, but they have no rights to them. They were essentially “renting” their right to practice their faith in their community, when they thought they had “bought” it.

  • Matthew

    These photos are gorgeous!

  • JT

    It’s really a theological matter.
    The leadership of the Roman Church believes that God has given the church (here I mean the worldwide church) to them, and given them authority to govern it as they see fit. So if they decide to close a parish, they see it as a God given right.
    The people (at least some of them) don’t see it that way. They seem to view the church – and here I mean a particular congregation – as a gift they have built with their gifts. It’s a gift they have given to God, and a gift they share as a community.
    The Roman church talks about community, but doesn’t seem to grasp the concept fully.
    So I’d vote with the people.

  • http://maclellanimages.com/ Ian MacLellan

    Really awesome storytelling with the audio slideshow.

    There is a true completeness to the storytelling that captures the community very well.

More stories in 'Boston'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari