WBURFormer Braintree Police Chief Criticizes State Investigation Of Bishop Shooting

BOSTON — More questions are emerging about the disturbing background of Amy Bishop, the Massachusetts native charged with shooting three university professors in Alabama Friday.

Former Braintree Police Chief John Polio. In 1986 his department responded to the fatal shooting of Seth Bishop. (Courtesy WCVB-TV)

In 1986, Bishop killed her brother at home in Braintree (PDF), a shooting ruled accidental by state police. But the Braintree police chief at the time is now criticizing that investigation, and wonders whether the Bishop family told a story to protect their daughter from a murder charge.

John Polio was the Braintree chief in 1986 when his department responded to a fatal shooting. As is usual with suspicious deaths, he handed the case over to the state, the Norfolk County District Attorney. State police interviewed the family 11 days later.

The report says the shooting was accidental, but Polio says he sees reason to question its thoroughness. “To me, it was deficient, that’s the best word I can use,” Polio said. “It was deficient.”

Polio said he knew the conclusion but that he never saw full report until this week. And now the 87-year-old said it doesn’t add up with what his police officers told him back then.

“The way it came across to me, there was an argument between the brother and the sister,” Polio said. “When in fact, according to the state police written report, the argument was between the father and the son.”

Polio expressed additional concern with details omitted by the report. For instance, he asked, exactly what type of shotgun was used? Polio’s understanding is that it was a shotgun that had to be reloaded after firing. The report does not explain how Amy Bishop was able to accidentally shoot multiple times. There is no ballistics test, either.

Polio said these are questions he would have wanted answered. “I’d like to think it was accidental but I can’t deny facts, happenings, you know?” Polio said. “It makes me wonder, absolutely it makes me wonder, whether it was accidental or not.”

Polio may have to keep wondering. The Norfolk County District Attorney said Monday it is not reopening the investigation — that the case of Amy Bishop shooting her brother dead in 1986 is closed.

WBUR Topics · Boston · Crime & Justice
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • B Goetz

    It looks like corruption in the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office that goes high up. I wonder if the public will stand for this?

  • B Goetz

    Also, the Norfolk County District Attorney’s office is the last place this case should be investigated.

  • alexdarc

    11 days seems like enough time your story straight.
    And hey why didn’t the state police ever interview the Braintree officers who were on the scene?

  • B Goetz

    The Norfolk County District Attorney says there is a statute of limitations on may lesser charges, but will not address the charge of murder, for which there is no statute of limitations. An independent investigation is needed.

  • B Goetz

    Correction: Delete the word “may” below.

  • Ken Brociner

    Hold on here. While the Norfolk County DA’s office and/or the State Police may have screwed up big time….and/or been involved in some sort of cover-up…why has the former Braintree police chief been allowed to (for the most part…including in this very report) escape critical scrutiny? It was HIS police dpt that let Amy Bishop go free the very same day she shot her brother, then pointed a shotgun and threatened at least two other people – and demanded a get away car!

    How does retired chief Polio explain this?!! As far as I can tell,neither the Norfolk DA…nor the State Police twisted his arm to release Bishop that very day!!

    Also WHY has there been no follow up (that I have seen) to look into the reports about Bishop’s mother being on the Braintree personnel committee of the town gov’t?

    Was Mr. (“I am just shocked to now read the State Police report on all this for the first time”) Polio in touch that day with Bishop’s mother? Might that be the reason her daughter was released that day…despite the outrageous events that had occurred? Mr Polio has a hell of a lot to answer for….and reports like this – and in the story in today’s Globe (2/18) give this man a benefit of the doubt that I believe is neither reasonable not judicious.

    As a very powerful letter in today’s Globe puts it, none of this passes “the smell test.”

More stories in 'Crime & Justice'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari