WBURCoakley Asks For Ruling Without Trial On DOMA Challenge

BOSTON — Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley is asking the federal government to bypass a trial in ruling on her challenge to the federal law that defines marriage as between a man and woman.

In court papers filed in U.S. District Court on Thursday, Coakley asked the judge for a summary judgment (PDF), which would rule the law unconstitutional without holding a full trial.

Last July, the attorney general filed a lawsuit challenging the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, saying the law violates state sovereignty and forces Massachusetts — the first state in the country to legalize gay marriage — to discriminate against same-sex couples.

Coakley argues that regulating marital status has traditionally been left to the states. She says the federal law treats married heterosexual couples and married same-sex couples differently, creating a two-tiered system of benefits for married couples in Massachusetts.

“The federal government has no legitimate interest in ‘preserving the status quo’ where the status quo is invidious discrimination,” Coakley wrote in Thursday’s motion.

“Massachusetts cannot receive or retain federal funds if it gives same-sex and different-sex spouses equal treatment, namely by authorizing the burial of a same-sex spouse in a federally-funded veterans’ cemetery and by recognizing the marriages of same-sex spouses in assessing eligibility for Medicaid health benefits,” she said.

Federal officials have until April 30 to respond to the motion.

WBUR Topics · Boston · Politics
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • kay

    “The federal government has no legitimate interest in ‘preserving the status quo’ ”

    What a disingenuous statement.

  • Gary

    Kay calls this filing “disingenuous”, but offers no basis for her bigoted statement. There is no reason to deny marriage equality. After 5 years, Massachusetts still has the lowest divorce rates, the sun still rises in the east, and the Red Sox won a world series.

  • Howiewho

    “we the people” Support States Rights per the constitution.

    I think Marriage is a faith based contract, so if your faith allows it you should have that faith based right any where. Why does the state require you to have a State contract.

  • kyndl

    Katheleen, Let me start by saying I am a listener,not a watcher. I am about peace,not violence. You are the first person I have talked to about this. It’s up to you to choose if you will help me and ride the wave of love. Will can be joined at the ears. Listen to your heart.

    Kyndl

More stories in 'Politics'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari