WBURWhen It’s Time To Choose Death For A Terminally Ill Child

BOSTON — It may seem unimaginable that parents could want a child to die.

But a new study by Boston’s Dana-Farber Cancer Institute finds there is a time when some mothers and fathers would choose death over life for a child: in cases of fatal illness, especially when a child is in extreme pain. And the researchers want to help families in this heart-breaking situation.

The findings reflect how devastating it is to watch a child suffer.

In interviews with researchers, more than 10 percent of parents whose children had died of cancer said they had considered speeding up their child’s death. And more than a third said they would weigh ending their dying child’s life sooner if the child were in uncontrollable pain.

These are feelings many mothers and fathers don’t want to say out loud.

“That is something that a parent doesn’t even want to share with other parents because society doesn’t allow you to talk about something like that,” said Patricia Loder, executive director of Compassionate Friends, a national organization that supports families after the death of a child.

There’s a social taboo against verbalizing those kinds of dark thoughts, Loder said. And that taboo causes some people to think, ” ‘You’re a parent and why on earth would you want your child to die?’ even though you’re watching them in such distress and such pain and such agony,” she added.

But some parents do have these feelings when they watch a child slowly dying from a fatal illness. In fact, the researchers said these emotions are probably under-reported because many parents are unwilling to admit to something that seems so abhorrent.

Ways To Ease A Child’s Suffering

But why study this?

Dr. Joanne Wolfe, the study’s senior author, said the point of her research is to try to make sure severely sick kids don’t end up in terrible pain. She said it’s also to make sure parents know there are ways to help a suffering child other than hurrying up death — and she wants doctors and families to talk about that openly.

“If we don’t enable conversation, then I can’t imagine what it would be like to hold those worries inside as you’re facing the end of your child’s life,” said Wolfe, director of pediatric palliative care at Dana-Farber and Children’s Hospital Boston.

The medical community does not focus enough on reducing pain in terminally ill children, Wolfe said. Many doctors who work with elderly patients routinely initiate end-of-life discussions. But doctors who treat children are often focused on curing them or extending their lives, even when the situation looks hopeless.

“I see children with life-threatening illness as kind of like an orphan population where we haven’t had enough of a focus on trying to improve the quality of our care,” Wolfe said.

Desperately sick children don’t have to suffer. Doctors could put them to sleep with medication to control their pain, a process called palliative sedation.

“And that’s not a euphemism for ending the child’s life,” Wolfe said. “You can get to the point where you even would administer general anesthesia, in which case the child would be asleep, but you’re not giving enough anesthesia to cause the child to stop breathing.”

Another option, called proportionately intensive symptom management, involves gradually increasing pain medication so a child dies in comfort.

Avoiding Uncomfortable Conversations About Death

Both of these are legal alternatives to hastening a child’s death, yet doctors and parents sometimes avoid discussing them at all, Wolfe said.

“The reality is that because it’s so tragic to face the loss of a child, most people don’t actually want to read about it in a newspaper, they don’t want to talk about it,” she added. “And not to say that this should be an everyday topic.”

But when a topic like this is ignored, parents may not even know these pain management strategies exist, she said. And doctors may not mention them because that could start an uncomfortable conversation about death.

Yet that’s when mothers and fathers need honesty most, said Loder, of Compassionate Friends.

“That’s the time where the parents need somebody to talk to, somebody to reason with them, somebody to tell them exactly what’s going to happen,” she said.

Because when parents know the truth, they can make the best end-of-life decisions for their children, Loder said. And if parents know there are ways to spare their kids from pain, they may not be driven to thinking that their kids are better off dead than alive.

The study appears in the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

WBUR Topics · Boston · Health
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • Sheila

    Doesn’t a parent’s wish to spare their child needless suffering indicate a more loving, caring parent? If the parents in this study were oblivious to their children’s suffering I would say there is a problem, but it seems entirely reasonable to me that a loving parent would want to save their child pain.

  • 3 Hawks

    It is a sad thing that religion dictates this life and death issue and truly any parent who is going though such difficult things has to make this difficult decision. Medical people want to keep people alive because it makes them money, but in truth there comes a time to let life go and relieve the pain of those dying. I honor parents who make this tough choice because it take a lot of love to let them go rather than be artifically driven to keep them alive. Medical professionals need to get a grip…and religion needs to butt out. Even with us old ones, when we want to go with dignity…that is our right. Bless you parents who let your suffering children go.

  • http://wbur Christine

    When my four year old daughter’s brain cancer returned, it was clear that curing her was no longer an option. Managing her pain and any fear she might be feeling become our number one priority. When the end came some 15 months later, I felt supported by the people at Dana Farber and Childrens and by the hospice workers and while the took care of all of us to a certain degree, my daughter and her pain was their focus. In fact there was a special team at Childrens who focused their work on helping parents with terminally ill children- the PAC Team. I got the information and support I needed to help my daughter.
    As my daughter’s pain become tougher to manage, she was put on a morphine drip. This was supposed to ease her into a sleeping/coma from which she would simply drift off. She surprised us all by still having short conversations with us while on this drip. Her death took longer than the medical people expected (ten long days and nights on the drip) , my girl did not want to go it seems. The cancer did not affect her will. Yet with the help of the hospice people I take great comfort in the fact that she did not suffer needlessly. She was clearly at peace, her face and body were relaxed and calm. Helping your child die with as little pain and fear as possible is a hellish job but there is no purer love than that of a parent protecting their child and letting them go.

  • Jeff

    What always gets me is that when an animal is in pain and agony and in a hopeless medical state, almost everyone agrees that the most humane thing to do is to put them out of their misery by killing then sooner instead of letting them die on their own, so we all acknowledge that it is MORE HUMANE to do this, YET we do this only for animals and force humans to suffer in agony.

    Terminal care is truly one of the bizarre cases where we treat animals more humanly than humans as a society.

    There are times when it is more humane to kill someone or more humane ot let someone kill themselves. We all know its true, so why do we force people to suffer? Forcing people to suffer should be what is against the law, not euthenasia.

  • http://www.causemedia.com Lisa

    Support is available to Massachusetts children with life-limiting illnesses and their families through a network of services. You can call the Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health’s Community Support Line at 1-800-882-1435 or the Pediatric Palliative Care Federation of MA at 781-255-7077.

  • Miss Penny

    it is horribke that families are forced to use cancer treatments that do NOT cure cancer! radiation and chemotherapy do NOt work they kill healthy cells and eventually the patient. There are alternatives to traditional cancer treatment. Cures that are documented. read Suzanne Sommers book KNOCKOUT and any other publication on organic foods or holistic health. IT WORKS!

  • Steve

    You guys are so brave to talk about this. It’s defintely right, but feels so intensely wrong.

  • Rudolf

    There is just a limited amount of medical care available. Time, effort and funds expended on supporting a child’s life that has no chance of succeeding and just prolonging pain and suffering could be better applied somewhere else where the outcome would be better. A painful but logical policy.

  • http://barb@callafamily.com Barbara

    When my 15 year old son was at the end of life with cancer, we were privileged to be guided and cared for by Dr. Joanne Wolfe. I am a nurse who would have gone to the end of the earth to change the outcome, but was a realist to know when the fight was over. How would I have been able to make the best decisions for my son if we did not have the “conversation”.

    His pain control was supported by the best of Children’s Hospital Pain Service. My family is comforted by the fact that my child was one of the very few in 2004 to die at home with the support of a Pediatric Hospice, with opioid pain control that did not hasten his death.

    Today, thanks to the State’s support, Pediatric Palliative Service’s money is well spent to ease the suffering of these children and their families in the end. It is not a huge amount of money, but it is priceless to the parents who hold their child in their arms pain free as they die.

More stories in 'Health'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari