The Associated PressSpeaker DeLeo Proposes Slots, 2 Casinos In Mass.

BOSTON — House Speaker Robert DeLeo reignited the debate over expanded gambling in Massachusetts on Thursday, proposing to build two casinos and add slot machines at the state’s four race tracks to generate badly needed revenue and create jobs for blue-collar workers.

Gov. Deval Patrick immediately challenged the slots element, saying, “The concern is this: that we’ll get the slots and we won’t get the casinos – and we need the jobs. The jobs come with the casinos.”

In a speech (PDF) to the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, DeLeo said expanded gambling would complement recent tax investments in expanding the life sciences and clean energy sectors.

While those have boosted white-collar employment, he said, blue-collar workers in the construction and service industries continue to suffer.

“I have cautioned before and I will caution again: Gaming is not a panacea,” DeLeo said. “But it is a plan that creates a new economic sector and new jobs in Massachusetts when we need them most.”
DeLeo said he will file a bill later this month.

“The time for talk has passed,” he said. “We now have to move on. We now have to take action.”

Patrick later told reporters that he had seen no new evidence to persuade him to support slot machines. “I don’t think it creates jobs,” he said, explaining casinos create dining, hotel, entertainment and other more robust economic activity.

The speaker aimed to soften expected opposition, saying the bill will propose using a portion of anticipated licensing fees to support existing manufacturers and lure new ones to Massachusetts. He said a fund would assist them with capital improvements, though he did not give specifics.

He also pledged to use some of the fees to enhance partnerships between community colleges, vocational schools and various industries.

In addition, DeLeo acknowledged concerns about the social costs – in terms of increased crime, divorce and alcohol and gambling abuse – that may come from expanded gambling.

“There is no doubt there is a social cost to gaming. But, too often we forget, there is also a social cost to joblessness. We need to get people working. We will devote a portion of any gaming revenue to addiction-treatment programs,” he said.

Massachusetts already allows gambling through its lottery games and live racing. But lottery revenues – whose proceeds are a vital source of cash for cities and towns – have fallen amid the recession. The state’s two horse-racing and two former greyhound tracks, both of which now offer only simulcast racing following a ban on dog racing, also have suffered.

In 2007, Patrick proposed building three resort-style casinos across the state to create jobs, add tax revenue and capture some of the money Massachusetts gamblers were spending at slot parlors and casinos in neighboring Rhode Island and Connecticut. Then-House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi opposed the plan, and it failed in the House by a vote of 106-48 in March 2008.

DiMasi resigned last year amid an ethics probe, and DeLeo has signaled his support for revisiting the issue.

Senate President Therese Murray, in her own appearance before the Chamber last year, mimicked pulling a slot-machine arm and said, “Ka-Ching!” when asked for her thoughts on expanded gaming in the state.

Despite his opposition to slot parlors, the governor has expressely not threatened a veto over that provision.

The issue is personal to DeLeo, though. There are two in the Winthop Democrat’s district: Suffolk Downs in Boston, which continues to offer live horse racing, and Wonderland in Revere, which offers only simulcast races after a dog-racing ban forced it to stop live greyhound races as of Jan. 1.

He told the chamber that putting a limited number of slots at venues that already have wagering will provide “a more immediate form of revenue.” He said he was trying to determine the appropriate number to support the tracks while not dampening a gambling company’s interest in building a casino.

And he said building two casinos – not the three proposed by Patrick – would avoid diluting their impact and “dooming them from the start.” He later told reporters he would not play a role in their siting, even though Suffolk Downs is in his district and Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino favors a license for it.

While DeLeo pledged to file the bill this month, the immediate affect of any legislation is in doubt. The state would have to establish and staff a new gambling commission, and overhaul its criminal and financial-reporting statutes, before additional gambling sites are created.

The current Massachusetts fiscal year ends June 30, and the next begins July 1. Administration and legislative financial experts have been wary of factoring any gambling revenues into their budget proposals before the end of the next fiscal year on June 30, 2011.

WBUR Topics · Boston · Economy & Business · Politics
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • http://middlebororemembers.blogspot.com/ Middleboro Remembers

    Slot parlors by any name bring crime, increased bankruptcies, family destruction, addiction and all the negatives you don’t want in your community. Slot parlors by any name bring low-wage dead-end jobs that provide no opportunity for advancement and no transferable skills.

    There is no community that has proven otherwise.

    Ninety percent of slot parlor profits come from 10 percent of patrons, a fact not denied by the industry. The industry requires addiction to survive.

    Three years after casinos were legalized in the small town of Deadwood, S.D., felony crimes had increased by 40 percent, child abuse had increased by 42 percent and domestic violence assaults had risen 80 percent.

    In Indiana, a review of the state’s gaming commission records revealed that 72 children were found abandoned on casino premises over a 14-month period.

    SMR Research Corp. has called gambling “the single fastest-growing driver of bankruptcy.” Gambling-related bankruptcies in metro Detroit increased by as much as 40-fold within 18 months of the opening of Casino Windsor, just across the Detroit River.

    Of Nevada: Democratic lawmakers often blame the low spending for the state’s ranking on what they call the bottom of all the good lists and the top of all the bad lists. Nevada has among the highest number of uninsured children and suicide rates, and among the lowest reading scores and college degrees per capita.

    The University of Northern Iowa included crime and bankruptcy statistics, among numerous other comparisons, and stated:

    The data over the 12-year period show that crime is higher in the casino counties in contrast to the control counties. The visual trends show higher number of total arrests and total offenses reported in the casino counties.

    The report may be found at http://www.1800betsoff.org/common/pdf/socioeconomic_gambling.pdf

    Something-for-nothing schemes are expensive.

    I recently found the quote below and found it particularly appropriate:

    “Blindfolded public officials practice job creation guided by wolves posing as seeing eye dogs.”

    The statistics are there for wise men to heed. I would hope our leaders are wise and refuse to support expanding gambling.

    Why would the Speaker continue to deny an Independent Cost Benefit Analysis to gather the facts?

    Please sign the Petition and join those calling for one, including the Mass Chiefs of Police Assn., the Governor, the Attorney General, and others. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/costbenanalysis/

  • Dana

    absolutely not. this just opens the door to criminal behavior and further exploits those with gambling problems. as soon as they opened the casino in upstate NY, there was a marked increase in drug and other crimes and adversely affected the area 100 miles around it.

  • http://nemasket.net nemasket.net

    DeLeo has refused to do a cost benefit analysis
    Has failed to show that new jobs will be created instead of transference of existing ones.
    Has failed to show that the benefits outweigh the costs.

    In other words, he doesn’t know how much it will cost or what the benefit is, but he’s going to do it any way.

More stories in 'Politics'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari