WBURQuestion 3: The Pros And Cons Of Cutting The Sales Tax

Tedd Tripp, a retired chemical engineer from North Andover, speaks at a Merrimack Valley Tea Party meeting. Tripp says the tax rollback is absolutely practical. (Kirk Carapezza for WBUR)

BOSTON — When voters go to the polls two weeks from Tuesday, they’ll face three ballot questions.

There are many pros and cons to the sales tax question, also called Question 3. It asks whether the state sales tax should be sliced by more than half — from 6.25 percent down to 3 percent.

Carla Howell, who was a Libertarian candidate for governor in 2002, wrote the ballot question. She says that keeping more money in people’s pockets will stimulate the economy.

“That’s money they can spend, save, give away, put an addition on their house, pay for their child’s tuition, pay off their credit card debts,” Howell says.

“It all goes back into the economy and creates jobs. One of the biggest beneficiaries will be retail businesses, especially along the northern border, where people run to New Hampshire to buy a lot of goods, and the retail sector especially along the border is hurt very badly by the high sales tax.”

On the other side is Steve Crawford. He’s with a group fighting the passage of Question 3 called the Coalition for our Communities.

Crawford says the state can’t afford to lose the estimated $2.5 billion that could be lost by rolling back the sales tax.

“That is half of what we spend every year on public education in Massachusetts. People who say they want to send a message, voting in support of the question is not the way to do that,” Crawford says. “This is a binding referendum. It becomes law, and every gubernatorial candidate is saying they will abide by the will of the voters.”

To dig deeper into Question 3, WBUR’s Bob Oakes traveled to North Andover, where he spoke with rollback supporters Tedd Tripp, a retired chemical engineer from North Andover, and Kamil Jain, who ran as an independent candidate for state auditor in the primaries.

Oakes also spoke with rollback opponent Rick Lord, the president of the Associated Industries of Massachusetts. Click “Listen Now” above for the interviews.

WBUR Topics · Boston · Politics
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • geffe

    These people are nuts, they live in a fantasy land.
    I notice they are mostly retired or older folks who don’t have kids in public schools, who are just selfish in general.

  • Christine Morabito

    Typical of people to resort to name-calling when they can’t win an arguement. And no, our kids are not in public schools. They go to private schools where they get a good education and DON’T waste our tax dollars.

  • John

    The sales tax is regressive and should be repealed but this isn’t the time to do it. Massachusets should tax gas to discourage its consumption and move to a graduated income tax.

  • You Poeple are Just STUPID

    Mass already has a 41 cents per gallon tax. Mass already has a property tax that supports school funding. As for the sub-moronic idiot )geffe) that claims that these people are “selfish.” Look in the mirror. Why should people that have no kids in public school, are retired or have no children pay for your Democratic snot-nosed brats? Gimme. Gimme. Gimme Other People’s Money.

  • Judith Lorimer

    There is no free lunch—-if you want decent teachers with reasonable class sizes, an adequately staffed and equipped police and fire department, safe highways and bridges, a safety net for the less fortunate, etc. it has to be paid for. A few cents on every dollar isn’t going to kill you, but a collapsing bridge just might.

  • kat

    To You Poeple are Just STUPID and others like you – you are the ones who are STUPID. For one, it’s clear that you are a failure of the school system as far as your spelling and also because of your failure to accept civic duty which true citizens, Democrats and Republicans, alike accept. And one of those duties is to support public education whether or not you have children or are retired. These children are the ones who will grow up and pay taxes and support you in old age. The more educated they are the better in that we maximize tax revenues. Your attitude reeks of extreme selfishness and if you don’t like this civic model then move to a 3rd world country where you don’t need to pay property tax to support local schools.

  • Kathryn

    They’re not taking the money from public education! That figure is used as an example! The purpose is to limit spending all around and public education SHOULD be the last thing to get cuts. If they cut from education instead of other areas well we shouldn’t be giving them extra money to make these poor decisions anyway. A mismanaged budget is worse than just a smaller budget.

More stories in 'Politics'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
Shop Now
Amazon.com
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari