To Get To The Heart Of The Great White Shark, Go Through Its Stomach

A white shark swims close to a pack of grey seals in the shallow water off Lighthouse Beach in Chatham. (Courtesy Massachusetts Energy and Environmental Affairs)

A white shark swims close to a pack of grey seals in the shallow water off Lighthouse Beach in Chatham. (Courtesy Massachusetts Energy and Environmental Affairs)

For the first time since a fatal encounter in 1936, human blood has been drawn by a great white shark in Massachusetts waters. Fortunately, this week’s victim is being treated for non-life-threatening injuries, having suffered severe lacerations to his legs. While shark bites are extremely rare, it probably won’t take another 76 years for the next unprovoked attack locally.

Why? They’re baaaa…ack.

The Return Of The Great White

Great white sharks are not common. They’re predators at the business end of the food chain. By nature, they number far fewer than the populations of prey that support them. State officials have tagged just six in Massachusetts waters this summer. Three tagged last summer have returned. State shark biologist Greg Skomal thinks there might be one or two untagged whites hanging around. That’s fewer than a dozen overall in Massachusetts waters this summer.

But that’s a dozen more than used to skirt the beaches of Chatham and Truro and Orleans. The sharks are back, because the seals are back.

A grey seal in Chatham Harbor on Cape Cod (ZaNiaC/Flickr)

A grey seal in Chatham Harbor on Cape Cod (ZaNiaC/Flickr)

Seals Came First

“When you hear a 95-year-old on the dock in Chatham say he’s never seen this many seals before in his life, he’s telling the truth,” Skomal said. Grey seals were nearly wiped out by 1900. They were competition for valuable fishing stocks. Massachusetts offered bounties on seals until 1962.

But in 1972, a new federal law prevented harming and harassing seals. Over the last 40 years, the grey seal population in Massachusetts has rebounded. They now number in the thousands here.

And following the growing abundance of prey are the predators.

We’re Gonna Need A Bigger Acoustic Array

While fishermen complain that the seals are catching their fish, the bigger economic interest is in beach communities, where fear of the sharks on the seals’ tails could take a bite out of tourism dollars.

So Massachusetts has deployed an acoustic array of underwater receivers that pick up the signals of sharks tagged with sound pingers called transponders. But each receiver only detects tagged sharks swimming within a few hundred yards. At $1,400 each, the devices are expensive.

They’re also costly to maintain, especially those farther from shore. Some wash away each year. So the state has deployed acoustic receivers where sharks are sighted more often: on the lower half of the eastern edge of the Cape, from Orleans to Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge.

“The problem is,” Skomal said, “… we have no receivers between Orleans and Truro.”

Truro, close to the northern edge of the Cape, is where this week’s attack happened. Skomal thinks the shark mistook the swimmer for a seal.

Sharks: A Tough Study

Truro and other coastal towns want to be able to know when sharks are in the area. They also want to be able to say when sharks are not around.

But based on the patchy acoustic array, and the handful of sharks in the area, it’s difficult for marine biologists to suss out behavioral patterns that could help communities know the probability a shark is in the area.

“When I talk about studying a sample size of nine [tagged sharks], other scientists just laugh at me,” Skomal said.

Grey seals bask off of Cape Cod on Aug. 19, 2011. (Mike's Birds/Flickr)

Grey Seals bask off of Cape Cod on August 19, 2011. (Flickr/Mike’s Birds)

Statistical Seal Of Approval

Yet there is a population that sharks key in on that offers a much larger sample size: the grey seal. Their colonies along the Massachusetts coast are easier to watch and track. But there hasn’t been systematic observation to lay the groundwork for better shark risk assessment.

“We don’t really know much about the seal behavior and the movement patterns and dynamics,” Skomal said. “They move around quite a bit. It’s something we need to learn more about.”

Hungry sharks are after the seals. Knowing more about what drives seal behavior and movement patterns may offer a better way to assess risk to swimmers.

To get to know what’s in the heart of the great white shark, state biologists will try to go through its stomach.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • Joemash

    Please, leave the sharks alone.  Talk about making something  out of nothing…he was more than a 100 yards from shore.  Sighting were had. Warning given. His bad. The rest of us, just stay close to shore…in the end, take your own chances if you want to go out to ‘the deep’ where they are!  No further comments on ‘victim’ life choices.  Or human’s arrogance towards Nature.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/BZPEC76G3ESGWEFSMN5ULYAUKM Alan

    I agree with Joemash, what does seal meat taste like. Maybe it’s time to cull what is becoming quite a herd. 

  • Paulmatthews28

    Just let nature be. Talk of killing seals or sharks is a futile response. One attack in 70 years! Get some perspective. Town hall fears drop in tourism dollar? Then seize the opportunity and promote the seals and shark dives. A cull of seals won’t solve anything. Sharks eat lots of stuff beyond seals eg dolphins, whales, larger fish, decaying stuff. They are v important to the survival of the local eco system including the seals. They help balance the seal population naturally. Humans need a more balanced response too.

  • DanMcCarthy

    When the fishing boats come in to Chatham Pier the seals get fed.  They get to eat what the fishermen throw back; heads, guts.  
    However, tourists are warned, by a large sign-DO NOT FEED THE SEALS.
    See for yourself, go there to that Chatham pier.
    The Avian Flu, that killed many seals, is probably transmissable to humans, if they ingest contaminated water.
    So, as far as swimming and frolicking in the water at Chatham; either the Seals go, or the tourists will be long gone.  

  • http://www.pelagic.org/research/index.html Sean Van Sommeran

    Greg Skomal quoted:

    “When I talk about studying a sample size of nine [tagged sharks], other scientists just laugh at me,”

    A few years back there was a sample size of none… as in O, zip.

    You guys are doing great with the spotting plane and tagging boat teams, take your time youve just recently started and these things take time.

    Out here in California (MBNMS) and Monterey Bay we’ve tagged 37 white
    sharks with transmitters since 2005; take your time Greg Skomal, Long Term
    Monitoring and non-invasive methods are best and provide best data sets.
    Keep up the good work with the lance and spotter plane method to deploy
    satellite pop-up transmitters and I highly recommend ultra sonic
    acoustic transmitters and Vemco monitors.

    I really hope you skip the clumsy and folly prone hook and barrel drag
    rodeo routine that injures the specimens, alters behavior and plays out
    like a reality TV spectacle and embarrassment. The SPOT tags deform the
    fins, harms the sharks and makes it harder to photo ID the specimens at
    offsite locations etc.

    Good luck and keep up the good work with the spotting planes and tagging
    lances, you should try working with lures; its low impact and works
    great with no injuries.



    S.R. Van Sommeran

    Executive Director

    Pelagic Shark Research Foundation



    Since 1990

    • Mintangel310

      Good call! These Sharks should be monitored & not killed! All sharks are important to our oceans & are magnificent fish! Keep up the good work! :) we humans do kill more sharks than shark attacks! :( thank you to all the researchers out there who study sharks & teach about the sharks behavior & patterns. The one more learns about them the more knowledge is gained!

  • Gggggggggg


Most Popular