WBUR

Boston Celebrates 150th Anniversary Of Emancipation Proclamation

This undated photo shows a detail from the rare original copy of President Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. (Seth Kaller, Inc./AP)

This undated photo shows a detail from the rare original copy of President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. (Seth Kaller, Inc./AP)

BOSTON — Tuesday marks the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, freeing slaves in the American South.

Huge celebrations erupted in Boston, an abolitionist center, on New Year’s Day in 1863. And on First Night 2013, the anniversary was marked as part of Boston’s festivities.

Boston’s Handel and Haydn Society performed the “Hallelujah Chorus” before an audience at Boston’s Music Hall 150 years ago, awaiting word of signing of the Emancipation Proclamation. Monday at First Night Boston, the same Handel and Haydn Society performed it again at the African Meeting House.

The program for a “Grand Jubilee Concert” held at the Boston Music Hall on January 1, 1863. (Massachusetts Historical Society)

The program for a “Grand Jubilee Concert” held at the Boston Music Hall on January 1, 1863. (Massachusetts Historical Society)

Beverly Morgan-Welch of the Museum of African American History said thousands gathered in Boston on that long ago New Year’s.

“There are two locations: the Boston Music Hall and Tremont Temple,” Morgan-Welch said. “And there are about 6,000 people who are gathered, most of whom are black. But of course, white abolitionists and the biggest names in the country are here in Boston. This is the huge public celebration.”

In 1863, the hymn “Blow Ye the Trumpet, Blow” was on the program at Tremont Temple. Among those gathered was former slave and abolitionist Frederick Douglass.

“While the people in Boston, once they finally learn that the president has signed the Emancipation Proclamation and understand exactly what the final document says, they throw their hats in the air,” Morgan-Welch said. “They sing and shout with jubilee, and as Douglass says, it is the first time he knows what joy truly is.”

“If you look at the black papers of the day, there were similar events all over the country, each of them waiting for the news of the Emancipation Proclamation,” Donald Yacovone of Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute said. “And why was there such urgency? Because they weren’t convinced it was going to happen. That’s why.”

“They also want to hear exactly what it says,” Morgan-Welch said. “Now, they know it doesn’t free everyone. It freed those enslaved in states and territories in rebellion against the Union. That didn’t include states that were in the Union where people were enslaved. Native American nations, some, had blacks who were enslaved and it did not free them.”

“It didn’t free all that many slaves, but was critical in transforming the war from one to only save the Union, to one to attack the institution of slavery.”
– Donald Yacovone, W.E.B. Du Bois Institute

Morgan-Welch and Yacovone said the Emancipation Proclamation laid the groundwork for the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery.

“It [the Proclamation] didn’t free all that many slaves, but was critical in transforming the war from one to only save the Union, to one to attack the institution of slavery,” Yacovone said. “And the fact that it led to the enlistment and recruitment of so many African-Americans in the army is also hard to overplay. It’s very critical.”

“It is a huge step for the country,” Morgan-Welch agreed.

This year, the Museum of African American History and Harvard’s Du Bois Institute are among those celebrating the impact of the Emancipation Proclamation and African-American military service.

“For us, it’s appropriate to recognize Jan. 1, [1863], as the beginning of an enormous process that transforms American history, the beginning of the second founding of the United States,” Yacovone said. “It is the beginning of a process that helps end slavery and transforms race relations in the United States, but it’s a very long process that we’re still engaged in to this day.”

This year, on the 150th anniversary of its signing, the Emancipation Proclamation is being displayed by the National Archives, along with the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • dlm

    It is not Hayden but Haydn

    • http://www.wbur.org/people/abby-elizabeth-conway Abby Elizabeth Conway

      We’ve fixed the error, thank you.
      -Abby, WBUR

  • http://www.facebook.com/lunelle.siegel Lunelle Siegel

    Sadly, this report isn’t quite right. If you read the 5th
    paragraph of the Proclamation, you will see that Lincoln EXEMPTED emancipating
    enslaved persons in the areas where he had authority to do so (occupied
    territory of Confederate States)!

    It also purports to abolish enslavement in the territory of
    the Confederate States unoccupied by Federal forces (where he did not have any
    authority). No enslaved persons in
    Virginia were freed with the stroke of Lincoln’s pen, or anywhere else for that
    matter.

    Perhaps Lincoln was trying to appease many masters without really accomplishing anything. Specifically: 1. how could federal forces continue to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850? This was a drain on military resources
    needed to prosecute the War; 2. how could he pacify the vocal abolitionists
    hoping to use the war as a way to project their objectives? ; 3. how could he solidify the neutrality by
    England, who, herself had peacefully ended slavery after spreading it
    throughout her realm? If she were to
    back away from this policy, would provide material aide to enemy (the “States….
    in rebellion”).

    This does raise another problem for Lincoln. Now the abolitionists would begin to claim that the War was to end slavery. This
    didn’t sit very well with many white northerners who, themselves, viewed the
    African as an inferior being based on “scientific” research of Dr. Samuel Morton, of Philadelphia (see “Complicity” – 2006: Farrow, Lang, Frank). Draft laws (conscription), upon being enforced in the summer of 1863, would result in massive draft riots, resulting in backlash on free New York City blacks including the deaths of at least 19 (remember the movie “Gangs of New York”?)

    Is enslavement of a people wrong? I hope no one disputes this. But the War was not started or prosecuted because of viewed equity of races of human beings. Consider this: if equality for all was the purpose of the most costly in (terms of lives) War in American history, did it accomplish its goals? If so, why was Dr. Martin Luther
    King, Jr.’s work necessary? Why was the Civil Rights act of 1964 (99 years after the end of the War) necessary?

    Bostonians should know, taxing Americans often has unintended consequences!

  • Dan

    I did go over to the Mass. Historical Society on 1154 Boylston Street and took a guided tour of the building and of Abraham Lincoln Proclamation exhibit and it is wonderful and very worth while. Best of all, it is free.

Most Popular