BOSTON — Boston residents are divided on bringing a casino to Suffolk Downs, according to a new poll from The Boston Globe.
More Coverage: Mass. Casinos
- Map: See All The Casino Proposals
- 7/14/14: 1 Way Mass. Casino Law Differs: Money For Neighboring Towns
- 7/11/14: Boston Reaches Impact Deal With Mohegan Sun
- 7/2/14: Mass. Casinos Have Majority Support, WBUR Poll Finds
- 6/24/14: Voters Can Decide Fate Of Casino Law, Mass. High Court Rules
- 6/13/14: Mass. Grants First Casino License To MGM Springfield
- 5/8/14: Boston No ‘Host Community’
- 5/8/14: Crosby Recuses Himself From Eastern Mass. Casino Vote
- 2/27/14: Plainville Gets Slots License
- 2/11/14: Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe In Final Phase Of Casino Land Bid
- 1/28/14: Foxwoods’ Fall River Plan
Forty-four percent of residents are in favor of the Suffolk Downs casino proposal, with 37 percent opposed, the poll found.
No casino can win a state license without first gaining support of the residents of the host community. In large cities, officials can hold a citywide election or restrict the vote to the neighborhood where the casino would be located. The Globe says a citywide vote would make for a tough campaign for Suffolk Downs. Sixty-six percent of respondents said they felt there should be a citywide vote.
Suffolk Downs’ $1 billion proposal in conjunction with Caesars Entertainment is competing against a Foxwoods Resort Casino proposal in Milford, and a Wynn Resorts Holdings proposal in Everett, for the sole eastern Massachusetts casino license.
Aside from trying to win over residents, Suffolk Downs is faced with another challenge: Mayor Thomas Menino’s decision not to run for reelection. The mayor has been a longtime supporter of the proposed casino, which would straddle East Boston and Revere.
Seth Daniel, a senior reporter for Independent Newspaper Group, which includes the Revere Journal and East Boston Times, joined WBUR’s Morning Edition (the audio player above) to talk about the possible ramifications of Menino’s departure on the proposal.