Mayor Doesn’t Want Bomb Suspect Buried In Boston

WORCESTER, Mass. — As the list of communities refusing to bury Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev grows, a solution could be nearing.

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino says he does not want Tsarnaev buried in the city and he believes the body should be returned to his parents in Russia.

“He believes he should be sent back to Russia. It wouldn’t be appropriate for him to be buried in Boston,” Menino spokeswoman Dot Joyce told The Associated Press. “He said his family wants him in Russia and that’s where he should go.”

Each day since Tsarnaev’s body was brought to a Worcester funeral home last Friday, protesters have gathered outside. They’ve placed plastic American flags and signs that say Tsarnaev’s body should “burn in hell,” not be buried in the U.S.

“He does not belong here; he belongs somewhere else. He belongs in Russia,” said Worcester resident Pamela Williams. “He’s a terrorist, he did something malicious. Why didn’t his uncle make arrangements to take his body back to Russia?”

Tsarnaev’s uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, has been in Worcester since Tamerlan’s body was brought here. Tsarni wanted to bury his nephew in Cambridge, where Tsarnaev lived, but the city manager said no. And on Tuesday, so did Menino, joining the many cities and cemeteries that have rejected the idea of the bombing suspect being interned on their land.

Tsarnaev’s mother wants to bury her son in Russia, but funeral home owner Peter Stefan doesn’t think Russia will take the body.

In recent days, counter-demonstrators have also gathered.

“I believe that everybody in the United States and everywhere in the world has the right to be buried,” said Vickie Langohr of Watertown. She’s a professor of political science at the College of Holy Cross in Worcester.

“We bury pedophiles and mass murderers and sex criminals and school shooters, and nobody raises questions about that,” Langohr said. “And this man also has a right to be buried as his family wishes him to. It doesn’t bring any victims back to deny this man burial and I’m very proud of the folks in the funeral home that had the guts to stand up and I just wanted to show them they’re not alone.”

The owner of the Worcester funeral home is the man in the middle. Stefan wants to do his job but can’t find a place willing to accept Tsarneav’s body, which has been washed and wrapped in the Muslim tradition. On Tuesday, the Worcester police chief, Tsarnaev’s uncle and the undertaker met to negotiate an end to the impasse.

“I think all parties involved want a solution found soon with regards to getting the deceased out of here,” said Worcester police spokesperson Sgt. Kerry Hazelhurst. “So they’re calling local areas and overseas and throughout the region. They’re pretty confident that there will be a solution and the solution will be in a couple of days.”

Perhaps as difficult as finding a place for Tsarnaev’s burial will be determining who pays for the round-the-clock police detail that has maintained public safety, crowd control and dealt with the media in Worcester. So far, the city says it has cost almost $40,000.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • Nat Sec

    From what I understand, Muslim tradition allows burial at sea if there is no other place for the body. This seems to be the case. The majority of the citizens of the country he attacked don’t want him, and his gravesite could be a perpetual magnet for problems. There are also problems with shipping his body to Russia. So why not a sea burial? Solve many problems.
    On another note I read that someone had offered a burial plot in Hamden Mass. While I know that is also protested, wouldn’t it be ironic he was buried in a place called HAM DEN? Even some of his own family might protest that!

    • vito33

      And the older brother was pronounced dead at Beth Israel.
      Russia would be fine, burial at sea would be fine… As long as we’re not paying for it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4600712 Daniel Eoin Duarte

    There are two things here… one, the same people who are aghast that a church would protest the funeral of a military member are the same people picketing a funeral home. Do people not live their lives based on principle anymore? The moment emotion suppresses logic terrible things occur. I wonder where Adam Lanza is buried? But oh no………. the big, bad “terrorist” label applies here.

    • tikideluth

      What is the principle that you feel is compromised?

      The two situations you’ve described don’t seem at all the same. One is the desecration of a ceremony meant to honor an individual whose life has been lost in service to their country; the other is refusing to honor a foreign villain who attacked innocent citizens on our soil out of hatred for the United States. Not sure that really compares…

  • http://twitter.com/hasanahmad80 Hasan Ahmad

    Was there a fuss like this when Seung-Hui Cho who was also a permanent resident and a south korean massacred students at virginia tech? Seems to me this is religious and ethnic barbarism more than anything else. People become so emboldened by the idea of terrorist retaliation that society starts to become as barbaric step by step like the terrorists

  • http://profiles.google.com/barry.kort Barry Kort

    It’s pretty clear that no cemetery open to the public wants to accept for burial the body of someone responsible for a heinous crime. The obvious reason is that cemetery officials know that there will be some who will desire to desecrate the grave, in a symbolic act of disrespect.

    This is hardly a new issue. Consider the sentiments of Jesus in Luke 9:60:

    Let those who are dispirited and bereaved bury their dead brethren in peace. Our mission is to build a more peaceable society for the sake of future generations.

  • GTV

    Two thoughts for Mayor Menino:

    (1) Mr. Mayor, there is a God; but it’s not you.

    (2) You don’t own Boston, so how can you decide that a body shall not be buried in this city?

Most Popular