WBURHull Parents Find The Downside Of A ‘Get Out The Vote’ Campaign

This spring, WBUR is examining how the state budget crisis is reverberating in cities and towns across Massachusetts. In Gardner, budget cuts are “amputating” a once-thriving small city. In Hull, students and parents have been forced to pay for extracurricular activities themselves. Fred Thys revisits Hull ahead of a critical vote later this month — whether to approve a property tax increase.


HULL, Mass. — In his family room, Greg Whelan, a young father of four, told a group of young mothers what a tax increase would buy.

“It’s a ton of AP classes that come in,” Whelan said. “We’re opening the wood shop. We’re opening the metal shop. We’re talking about bringing back foreign language to the middle school.”

But the mothers see a big hurdle to getting those new classes. They think Hull has an inferiority complex and sees itself as a working-class place where the schools will never measure up to its two tony neighbors, Hingham and Cohasset. Two of the mothers, Amy Hyde and Laurie McDowell, don’t think that inferiority complex is justified.

Some residents think Hull has an inferiority complex — a place where the schools will never measure up to those of its neighbors.

“It’s like, who’s the ‘Saturday Night Live’ character?” McDowell said. “You know? I believe in myself — what does he say?”

Hyde knew it: “‘I like me. Dog-gone it, I like me.’ ”

“Yeah,” McDowell said. “We need to have a love-in or something.”

“It’s OK to be smart,” adds another mother, to laughter.

One mother points out that despite the budget cuts, the town does well on the MCAS exam. The high school is in the top third in the state on the English, math and science tests.

Another, Michelle Proud, believes that if the town would only fund the schools, more parents would be drawn to Hull because it’s a great place to raise kids.

“In so many ways, we’re a little bit isolated and protected by being this small town at the end of the Earth here,” Proud said. (Hull is a series of glacial islands, called drumlins, each linked to the next by a sand bar.)

“I think that once our image of our school system makes that swing, I think you’re going to start seeing the schools being more populated,” Proud said. She argues that the property tax increase is a small price to pay for better schools.

“Our house is valued at about $300,000,” Proud said. “Our portion would be $89 a quarter. I mean, I pay more than $89 a month for my cell phone.”

“Some people have that money, but some people don’t,” said Carrie Nath, another at the meeting. “I was thinking of an old neighbor of mine who literally is living from whatever Social Security check, barely making it.”

“We can’t stay under the radar forever.”

– Parent Mike Fleming, who favors the property tax increase

The big political bind for these parents is that if they campaign too visibly for raising property taxes, all the people who oppose or can’t afford an increase will show up at the polls later this month and put a stop to it. So the parents have been holding strategy meetings at their homes and the middle school to prepare for the vote. At one, Mike Fleming, Marianne Hart and Mark Beacher disagree over whether they should use Monday night’s town meeting to push their cause.

“Thought we were just talking to parents,” Beacher said. “If you go in front of the town meeting, then you’re getting it out to everybody, which is what we were trying to be kind of, like, discreet about, weren’t we?” Hart shares the same thoughts: “I’m very hesitant about handing anything out at town meeting,” she said.

“We can’t stay under the radar forever,” Fleming said.

They decide they will campaign for the tax increase at Monday’s town meeting. Some parents are so worried about tipping off the opposition they argue about things like how soon they should start planting lawn signs.

“A week before, like, it’s game time,” Whelan said.

“Signs are great, actually,” Fleming said. “And maybe like two weeks in front, because if you look back at Scott Brown, maybe a week or two before the election, you started seeing more and more Scott Brown signs, and you’re driving around, and after a while, there’s Scott Brown signs everywhere, and everyone that day of the election knew who was going to win.”

But Hart differs on the strategy. “What we had learned, in the towns that had passed their overrides, was do not do signs, ’cause all you’re doing is reminding the ‘No’ votes to get out there and vote.”

Even though they concede they’ll remind the ‘No’ votes to get out there, the parents decided that getting the ‘Yes’ votes out is worth rolling out the lawn signs. But they agreed to wait until a couple of weeks before the vote.


Correction: The online version of this story incorrectly called the parents’ meetings “private.” We have corrected the error.
WBUR Topics · Boston · Economy & Business · Education · Politics
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on wbur.org.
  • Tyrone

    Only in Massachusetts do people consider democracy evil, and do not want the vote to reflect the community’s wishes. hence the stealth campaign in Hull. As a former teacher, I’ve yet to see a “it’s for the schools” Prop 2.5 override benefit anyone other than the Teacher’s Union. This is not the best Civics Lesson people would give their children if they truly cared about those children.

  • Michael Massagli

    If the override doesn’t pass, the schools budget will still increase over 5%. When times are tough for everybody, maybe they could just live with that until times are better. Oh, but wait, that will be tough because the School committee just negotiated an extension of the agreement with the teachers, including raises, before the old agreement expired and before town meeting, the override vote, or elections. Seems too easy for these folks to spend other people’s money and money they don’t have. Hasn’t there been enough of that?

  • Greg Whelan

    For the record, the recently inked contract extention with the teachers union was negotiated within the constraints of the current budget and has nothing to do with the override. I would also point out that the lions share of the “raises” in fact cover the cost of the additional instruction time the schools will gain through the lengthening of the school day (Please check out the Town of Hull web site for additional facts). Final point: If Hull had prioritized learning goals for its students long ago and funded to a level appropriate to drive the sort of skill sets our kids need in the 21st century, whether they head into the trades, to the workforce, to the service or higher education, perhaps it would be a bit easier for us to ‘live with it’. Please check out http://21stcenturyhull.org/ for additional information.

  • jay

    Abolish the greedy public sector unions and vote out their left wing paid off political enablers.
    They are ruining the country.

  • Michael Massagli

    o.k. Greg. If raises can be had within the current budget; if the school day can be lengthened within the current budget; then live with the current budget, which will increase over 5% without the override. User fees for sports? That’s o.k. too. And if priorities for learning need to be readjusted, do that within the current budget too.

  • http://Hullblog.com Hullblog.com

    Share your thoughts here. Hullblog.com

  • Robert Carney

    I think the reporter or someone else missed a few things here. The meetings aren’t private, stealthy or otherwise secretive – I found out about them when I asked a friend some questions on the override (starting from a fairly skeptical position) and went to hear a more. (And I was lead to the right room by a fairly obvious sign.) I’ve gone to some of those meetings and they’re open – wide open. It’s simply a group of folks that are interested in discussing and advancing the Hull school system and trying to figure and support the best way to do that. This school system has made a lot of progress and I and many others would hate to see that progress lost.

  • Ed

    Truth-Seekers,
    Although I find these comment boards to be the wrong place for carrying on an effective debate of an issue, I also find the focus of this whole article got a bit skewed. I hope any of you who look to be informed can realize that Mike’s comment about “an increase of over %” was an over-simplification. Standing alone, that statement obscures reality. The fact is that the FY 2011 budget, as currently recommended, provides only level-services. It does not provide an increase to the level of services, it reflects the increased COST of providing the same services, and this is completely consistent with the “General Government” line item in the FY 2011 budget, which is also “increasing” by the same 5.25% but is also providing only the same level of services next year as this year. To me, Mike’s comment as stated lacks credibility because it implies things which are NOT reality. I support the override because I have looked into what it means to the schools of Hull. To be more informed, hit the link in Greg’s comment.

  • Marianne Harte

    I wanted to say thank you for the correction regarding the meetings being held in private. It was kind of ironic since Mr. Thys sat in on our meeting at a public school! Check us out on Facebook as well:
    21st Century Schools – Hull.
    And again, thank you.

More stories in 'Politics'
UNDERWRITING
Most Popular
Shop Now
Amazon.com
SUPPORT
This site is best viewed with: Firefox | Internet Explorer 9 | Chrome | Safari