It can be tricky to determine, with any certainty, where the candidates stand on the issues, including on issues of science.
That's why, for the second presidential election cycle in a row, Scientific American magazine has partnered with ScienceDebate.org to pose 20 questions to the candidates — questions that were developed and refined by dozens of scientific organizations that represent more than 10 million scientists.
The candidates' responses were graded on three criteria: Does the answer actually address the question posed? Is the answer well-informed, with respect to scientific consensus? Does the answer have workable details?
Here & Now's Robin Young talks with Christine Gorman, a senior editor at Scientific American who oversaw the process, about the questions, and the candidates' answers and grades.
This segment aired on October 11, 2016.
- After Decades Of Disagreement, Climate Politics Are Still Heated
- Overnight Polls Say Clinton Won Debate Round 2
- Court Battle Begins For Obama's Clean Power Plan
- These Students Are Backing A Third Party
- How Climate Change Is Cranking The Heat On Public Health Crises
- Climate Change Upends Ecosystems From Pole To Pole
- What You Can Do About Climate Change
- Where Do The Third Party Candidates Stand, And Who Are Their Supporters?